Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Z-Test
The z-test uses Z-scores to conduct significance testing for large samples. There are a number of significance tests in which the sampling distribution has the form of the normal probability density function, which is then transformed into the standardized normal probability density function, so that the test scores become z-scores. A simple example is the test about a population mean such as a mean IQ score. If the null hypothesis states that the mean is 100 (H0 :μ = 100), then this is an exact hypothesis. If it states that the mean is at most 100 (H0 : μ ≤ 100), then it is an inexact hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis for the latter case could be that the mean is greater than 100 (Ha : μ>100). The test would then be one-tailed, because we hypothesize that the people of our sample are more intelligent than 100 on the average. For the two-tailed test, the alternative hypothesis would be Ha : μ ≠ 100. It is common to combine an inexact alternative hypothesis with an exact null hypothesis. For example, the alternative hypothesis that the mean IQ of a population is more than 100 (Ha : μ> 100) is tested against the null hypothesis that the mean is equal to 100 (H0 : μ = 100).
Z-TEST OF A SINGLE MEAN
The z-test will be performed by evaluating the ratio (x¯−μ)/σx¯ —where x¯ is the sample mean, μ is the population mean under H0, and σx¯ is the standard error of the mean (standard deviation of the sampling distribution of means under H0)—when we are interested in testing the foregoing hypothesis about the mean IQ of the population. This ratio transforms a mean deviation into a z-score. Now suppose that in a sample of n = 900, randomly drawn with replacement, x¯ = 102 and s = 10. The sample is large enough, according to the central limit theorem, so the sampling distribution should be normal with mean equal to the population mean μ and variance σx¯ = σ2/n. Because σ is unknown, the variance of the sampling distribution will be estimated as ^σ2x¯ = s2/n (instead of σ2/n), and its square root gives ^σx¯. Our sample result, x¯ = 102, is subsumed under the sampling distribution with mean 100 and variance s2/n = 102/900 = 0.111. Its z-score is then z = (102 − 100)/√0.111 = 6. For this value of z or higher, we find in the standardized normal table a probability of 0.000001, which is so small (much smaller than a probability of making a type I error of α = .05 or even of α = .001) that it is highly unlikely to find this sample result under the null hypothesis. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected, and we have found empirical support for the alternative hypothesis that μ>100. We may mention here that we do not know what the probability of type II error β is, but with a sample of large size (n = 900), we can be confident that β will be small.
...
- Analysis of Variance
- Association and Correlation
- Association
- Association Model
- Asymmetric Measures
- Biserial Correlation
- Canonical Correlation Analysis
- Correlation
- Correspondence Analysis
- Intraclass Correlation
- Multiple Correlation
- Part Correlation
- Partial Correlation
- Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
- Semipartial Correlation
- Simple Correlation (Regression)
- Spearman Correlation Coefficient
- Strength of Association
- Symmetric Measures
- Basic Qualitative Research
- Basic Statistics
- F Ratio
- N(n)
- t-Test
- X¯
- Y Variable
- z-Test
- Alternative Hypothesis
- Average
- Bar Graph
- Bell-Shaped Curve
- Bimodal
- Case
- Causal Modeling
- Cell
- Covariance
- Cumulative Frequency Polygon
- Data
- Dependent Variable
- Dispersion
- Exploratory Data Analysis
- Frequency Distribution
- Histogram
- Hypothesis
- Independent Variable
- Measures of Central Tendency
- Median
- Null Hypothesis
- Pie Chart
- Regression
- Standard Deviation
- Statistic
- Causal Modeling
- DISCOURSE/CONVERSATION ANALYSIS
- Econometrics
- Epistemology
- Ethnography
- Evaluation
- Event History Analysis
- Experimental Design
- Factor Analysis and Related Techniques
- Feminist Methodology
- Generalized Linear Models
- HISTORICAL/COMPARATIVE
- Interviewing in Qualitative Research
- Latent Variable Model
- LIFE HISTORY/BIOGRAPHY
- LOG-LINEAR MODELS (CATEGORICAL DEPENDENT VARIABLES)
- Longitudinal Analysis
- Mathematics and Formal Models
- Measurement Level
- Measurement Testing and Classification
- Multilevel Analysis
- Multiple Regression
- Qualitative Data Analysis
- Sampling in Qualitative Research
- Sampling in Surveys
- Scaling
- Significance Testing
- Simple Regression
- Survey Design
- Time Series
- ARIMA
- Box-Jenkins Modeling
- Cointegration
- Detrending
- Durbin-Watson Statistic
- Error Correction Models
- Forecasting
- Granger Causality
- Interrupted Time-Series Design
- Intervention Analysis
- Lag Structure
- Moving Average
- Periodicity
- Serial Correlation
- Spectral Analysis
- Time-Series Cross-Section (TSCS) Models
- Time-Series Data (Analysis/Design)
- Trend Analysis
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches