Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The z-test uses Z-scores to conduct significance testing for large samples. There are a number of significance tests in which the sampling distribution has the form of the normal probability density function, which is then transformed into the standardized normal probability density function, so that the test scores become z-scores. A simple example is the test about a population mean such as a mean IQ score. If the null hypothesis states that the mean is 100 (H0 :μ = 100), then this is an exact hypothesis. If it states that the mean is at most 100 (H0 : μ ≤ 100), then it is an inexact hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis for the latter case could be that the mean is greater than 100 (Ha : μ>100). The test would then be one-tailed, because we hypothesize that the people of our sample are more intelligent than 100 on the average. For the two-tailed test, the alternative hypothesis would be Ha : μ ≠ 100. It is common to combine an inexact alternative hypothesis with an exact null hypothesis. For example, the alternative hypothesis that the mean IQ of a population is more than 100 (Ha : μ> 100) is tested against the null hypothesis that the mean is equal to 100 (H0 : μ = 100).

Z-TEST OF A SINGLE MEAN

The z-test will be performed by evaluating the ratio (x¯−μ)/σ —where x¯ is the sample mean, μ is the population mean under H0, and σ is the standard error of the mean (standard deviation of the sampling distribution of means under H0)—when we are interested in testing the foregoing hypothesis about the mean IQ of the population. This ratio transforms a mean deviation into a z-score. Now suppose that in a sample of n = 900, randomly drawn with replacement, x¯ = 102 and s = 10. The sample is large enough, according to the central limit theorem, so the sampling distribution should be normal with mean equal to the population mean μ and variance σ = σ2/n. Because σ is unknown, the variance of the sampling distribution will be estimated as ^σ2 = s2/n (instead of σ2/n), and its square root gives ^σ. Our sample result, x¯ = 102, is subsumed under the sampling distribution with mean 100 and variance s2/n = 102/900 = 0.111. Its z-score is then z = (102 − 100)/√0.111 = 6. For this value of z or higher, we find in the standardized normal table a probability of 0.000001, which is so small (much smaller than a probability of making a type I error of α = .05 or even of α = .001) that it is highly unlikely to find this sample result under the null hypothesis. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected, and we have found empirical support for the alternative hypothesis that μ>100. We may mention here that we do not know what the probability of type II error β is, but with a sample of large size (n = 900), we can be confident that β will be small.

...

locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading