Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Quota Sample
Quota sampling is a method of selecting respondents for surveys. Survey administrators assign quotas to interviewers that define groups of respondents by using a few key demographic characteristics. Interviewers fill their quotas by choosing individuals whose characteristics match these characteristics as respondents. When the responses are combined for all of the respondents, the characteristics of the sample precisely match specified demographic characteristics of the survey population. For example, an interviewer may be assigned a quota of four African Americans, eight whites, two Hispanics, and two Asian Americans, half of which live in the central city and half of which live in the suburbs. When all of the interviews are completed, the aggregate statistics for the sample and the study population will match exactly for the demographic characteristics that were included as interview criteria. However, matching on aggregate statistics does not ensure that the sample will accurately reflect the population on the variables that are of interest in the study.
The most infamous example of the bias that can occur with quota sampling involves polling for the 1948 presidential election. This election pitted Harry Truman, the Democratic candidate who had assumed the presidency when Franklin D. Roosevelt died, against Thomas Dewey, the Republican candidate. Three polling firms—Roper, Gallup, and Crossley—all declared Dewey as the winner based on interviews that had been conducted using quota sampling methods. Of course, Truman won with just under 50% of the popular vote, beating Dewey by nearly five percentage points. The quota samples were carefully matched to census data on age, race, gender, rent paid, and residence, but the interviewers had chosen too many Republicans. Republicans were easier to interview, either more willing to participate or more approachable, and thus Democrats were underrepresented in the interviews. After that election, newspapers were filled with stories about the failure of the pollsters, as well as many commentators. Subsequently, all three polling firms dropped quota sampling techniques.
The failure to accurately predict the 1948 election provided an impetus toward the use of probability samples and very limited use of quota samples for social science research as well as polling. Most pre-election polling relies on random digit dialing (RDD) to select households from which adult respondents are selected at random, or random computergenerated selection of a sample from an automated list of eligible voters. Specific individuals are identified by these survey procedures, and interviewers are not allowed to substitute respondents, thereby eliminating interviewer discretion and selection bias.
Bias and Quota Sampling
The principal reason that the quota samples may not provide accurate information about the population is that the interviewers have discretion over who is interviewed. Whenever human judgment is allowed to determine who is selected, even though, in this case, the interviewers must meet demographic quotas, unintentional bias creeps into the selection process. Although the bias is unintentional, it can cause significant errors in the study data and the estimates (e.g., means, proportions, or regression coefficients) that are produced from the data.
Quota samples are nonprobability samples, which are sometimes referred to as purposive or convenience sampling. Nonprobability samples have the common characteristic that human judgment has a role in determining which individuals are selected to respond to the interviewers’ questions. Nonprobability samples are often contrasted with probability samples, where each individual in the study population has a (known), nonzero chance of being selected as a respondent. Probability samples rely on a random mechanism to identify the individual study population member to respond to the interviewer. Once identified, no substitution is allowed by the interviewers (Hess, 1985). If the identified individual cannot be reached or refuses to respond, the case is considered missing data and contributes to the nonresponse bias for the study. With quota sampling, a refusal leads to an interviewer identifying another individual with the necessary characteristics and interviewing the newly identified person to fill his or her quota. Because quota samples do not begin with lists of the study population or maintain records of refusals, it is impossible to analyze the potential bias in these samples. However, many studies and analytical procedures have been conducted to estimate the bias stemming from nonresponse on surveys using probability samples (Keeter, Miller, Kohut, Groves, & Presser, 2000).
...
- Analysis of Variance
- Association and Correlation
- Association
- Association Model
- Asymmetric Measures
- Biserial Correlation
- Canonical Correlation Analysis
- Correlation
- Correspondence Analysis
- Intraclass Correlation
- Multiple Correlation
- Part Correlation
- Partial Correlation
- Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
- Semipartial Correlation
- Simple Correlation (Regression)
- Spearman Correlation Coefficient
- Strength of Association
- Symmetric Measures
- Basic Qualitative Research
- Basic Statistics
- F Ratio
- N(n)
- t-Test
- X¯
- Y Variable
- z-Test
- Alternative Hypothesis
- Average
- Bar Graph
- Bell-Shaped Curve
- Bimodal
- Case
- Causal Modeling
- Cell
- Covariance
- Cumulative Frequency Polygon
- Data
- Dependent Variable
- Dispersion
- Exploratory Data Analysis
- Frequency Distribution
- Histogram
- Hypothesis
- Independent Variable
- Measures of Central Tendency
- Median
- Null Hypothesis
- Pie Chart
- Regression
- Standard Deviation
- Statistic
- Causal Modeling
- DISCOURSE/CONVERSATION ANALYSIS
- Econometrics
- Epistemology
- Ethnography
- Evaluation
- Event History Analysis
- Experimental Design
- Factor Analysis and Related Techniques
- Feminist Methodology
- Generalized Linear Models
- HISTORICAL/COMPARATIVE
- Interviewing in Qualitative Research
- Latent Variable Model
- LIFE HISTORY/BIOGRAPHY
- LOG-LINEAR MODELS (CATEGORICAL DEPENDENT VARIABLES)
- Longitudinal Analysis
- Mathematics and Formal Models
- Measurement Level
- Measurement Testing and Classification
- Multilevel Analysis
- Multiple Regression
- Qualitative Data Analysis
- Sampling in Qualitative Research
- Sampling in Surveys
- Scaling
- Significance Testing
- Simple Regression
- Survey Design
- Time Series
- ARIMA
- Box-Jenkins Modeling
- Cointegration
- Detrending
- Durbin-Watson Statistic
- Error Correction Models
- Forecasting
- Granger Causality
- Interrupted Time-Series Design
- Intervention Analysis
- Lag Structure
- Moving Average
- Periodicity
- Serial Correlation
- Spectral Analysis
- Time-Series Cross-Section (TSCS) Models
- Time-Series Data (Analysis/Design)
- Trend Analysis
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches