Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Writing a Discussion Section

A discussion section is the section of a research paper or journal article in which authors present their interpretation of the major findings of their research. Discussion sections are one of the four major sections (i.e., introduction, method, results, and discussion) of most types of research papers. The discussion section typically includes the following components: (a) the significance of the study, (b) interpretations of the significant results, (c) implications, (d) limitations, (e) future studies, and (f) conclusion. The discussion section is placed at the end of the paper or article; but depending on the format required by a course professor or journal, the conclusion might be a separate section following the discussion section. For many academicians, the discussion section is a central focus of the paper or article, because in it, the authors answer the questions posed in the introduction. Thus, a well-written and well-organized discussion section is crucial, and often an essential criterion for publication acceptance.

In addition, it is important for authors to consider how their results fit into the bigger picture, that is, how their research relates to other research in the field. To see how their findings fit within this larger scope, researchers can ask questions such as, “Are there any trends in the data I have?” or “Are my findings in line with the data other researchers have previously provided?”

The remainder of this entry describes how to structure a discussion section with information on key components of the section. The importance of objectivity and scholarly tone and language use when writing the discussion section is also discussed.

Structure

When writing up the results of their research, researchers should make clear and logical arguments that the readers can easily follow. To do so, the authors need to be mindful of their organization, their word choices, the level of knowledge of their audience, and possible questions that readers might have. Conventionally, the discussion section starts with the significant findings, followed by the authors’ interpretations of the findings, implications of the study, limitations, future research, and a conclusion. In addition, most discussion sections start with general concepts and proceed to more specific ideas. Subheadings help organize the section by themes or concepts.

For research involving multiple experiments, authors usually include a short discussion section for each experiment. A comprehensive general discussion is then included after all the experiments are discussed. In the general discussion, authors clarify the significance of the entire research and their findings, and compare the results of each experiment. The following subsections discuss in turn each of the important components of a discussion section.

Summary of Significant Findings of the Study

When writing a summary of significant findings of their research, researchers first remind readers of the hypotheses and research questions introduced earlier in the paper, as well as findings of previous studies on the topic, and relate their findings to the hypotheses. For example, if the hypotheses were supported, then the authors explain what that means and why the readers need to be concerned about those results. At times, the hypotheses might be partially supported. If so, the authors clarify what was supported and what was not. If a hypothesis was not supported, the authors provide a thorough explanation why the hypothesis failed to receive support. Authors can also discuss possible alternative explanations and hypotheses.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading