Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Structuration Theory

Structuration theory (ST) is a social theory used by communication studies scholars to explain connections between situated interactions and social structures of meaning, norms, and power. Most commonly associated with sociologist Anthony Giddens, structuration theory was proposed and elaborated to reconcile conceptual differences in social research between those who focus solely on macro-processes, such as institutional power, and those who focus solely on micro-processes, such as situated interactions. ST views macro-processes and micro-processes as inextricably linked through ongoing, recursive social practice. ST is a broad theoretical perspective rather than a theory with a concrete set of testable propositions and its own methodological assumptions. As such, it has been used in studies across a variety of communication contexts, including organizations, technology-mediated communication, small groups, and families. Because of its widespread use in the communication discipline, it is important to understand methodological choices for conducting structuration studies of communication.

This entry describes three broad methodological choices for conducting ST-based communication research. One method is to decide whether the focus of the study will be on institutions or on actions. To be clear, the purpose of ST is to recognize that institutions and actions are not separable in reality. However, no study can analyze absolutely everything. Accordingly, although an ST researcher will need to study action in an institutional analysis and, on the other hand, will need to study institutions in a study of action, each approach necessitates giving primary attention to one or the other. For either methodological choice, the emphasis of an ST study is on the recursive pattern between action and structure, which is called the duality of structure.

This entry begins with an overview of qualitative approaches, the methodology most widely used for structuration studies. Quantitative approaches are also described, with examples of how quantitative methodologies might be employed for ST-based analyses. Finally, mixed-methods approaches are discussed with examples of how combining qualitative and quantitative methods in one study may be used for ST-based projects.

Qualitative Approaches

Several qualitative methods have been used to analyze structuration, including case studies, ethnography, and interview studies. Case studies represent the most common qualitative method for conducting ST-based communication studies. The reason case studies have been used so frequently for ST studies is that they allow for observing and analyzing ongoing social practices, which are the focus of ST. A case study is an in-depth analysis of one particular case, such as one family, one organization, or one group. Some case studies include more than one case, as in studies that analyze communication in two groups or organizations that have something in common for the analysis. Studies involving more than one case frequently involve comparing cases to each other as they experience a common phenomenon or process, such as an organizational change initiative or a policy decision. The challenge with case studies involving more than one case is the ability to have the same breadth of access to all cases involved, have similar depth of data collection available, and have similar lengths of time for analysis of the included cases. This is often logistically impossible for one researcher, or even for a team of researchers, so published studies more often concern a single case rather than multiple cases.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading