Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Social Cognition

The field of social cognition concerns individuals’ thought processes in the context of the social world—how people think about themselves and other people. Although rooted in social psychology, social cognition is an interdisciplinary area of study and borrows from other fields, such as communication, developmental psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience. In addition, social cognitive theory and research can be applied to real-world contexts, such as the legal system, health care, and marriage counseling. This entry provides an overview of the methodological tools and procedures used to study social cognition. Common critiques of these methods are also discussed.

Social cognition describes how a person reacts to stimuli and their response to it. The stimuli are often people or aspects/attributes of people that are related to the social world. Researchers interested in social cognition commonly seek to understand (a) mental representations, (e.g., schemas, which are cognitive elements that can be activated and made accessible to influence perceptions), (b) the cognitive processes involved in the reactions based on perceptions of observable stimuli and observable responses, and (c) communicative or social processes and outcomes that are related to social cognition. This characteristic of social cognition differs slightly from examining observable responses alone, which emphasizes the outcome over the entire process; social cognition focuses more on the entire process than just its end. Social cognition differs from cognition in its emphasis on people, as people are different than objects and are able to simultaneously perceive and be the subject of perception. However, this process is complex because people are multidimensional; people vary their behavior and attitudes according to how they think they are being perceived. Such metaperceptions, of course, are not infallible and are susceptible to inaccuracies, which add to the complexity.

The methodological approaches employed to examine social cognition are a defining feature of social cognition research. Although the measurement tools often draw from other fields (e.g., cognitive psychology), when combined with its theoretical impetus, social cognition provides a unique vantage point from which to understand human behavior and perception.

Measurement Paradigms

Priming

Priming is a core methodological tool that social cognition researchers employ. Priming relies heavily on the idea of cognitive accessibility, which is the mental activation of psychological constructs or representations. Priming is the process of activating mental representations. Constructs are usually experimentally primed (i.e., made accessible) so that their effects on information processing can be examined, such as attention or encoding. Priming can be an independent variable, as in the case of research on goal formation, or it can be a dependent or mediating variable, wherein priming responses serve as indicators of related mental processes, such as metaphor comprehension. There are three major types of priming.

Semantic Priming

Semantic priming assumes that the participant’s response to a given word is facilitated by a related word. Semantic priming tasks can be conducted using a within-subjects design, wherein researchers present a prime-target pair of related words (e.g., common female names and stereotypically feminine job titles) and a pair of unrelated words (to act as a neutral priming condition) to the same participant to examine differences between participants’ response times to the two pairs of words. Much more common, however, are between-subjects semantic priming tasks in which participants are randomly assigned to either a list of prime-target pairs of related words or a list of unrelated words that are composed of the same words used in the first list but randomized in such a way that primes and targets are unrelated to each other. The most frequently used semantic priming task is the Lexical Decision Task. Participants are presented with a prime and a target word. The target can be a legal word or a nonword (a meaningless combination of letters), and the participant must quickly decide whether it is a legal word or not. When the prime and the target are related, lexical decisions typically are significantly quicker and more accurate than when they are unrelated. Another common method is the Naming Task. Participants are presented with a prime and a target word. Participants must read the target word aloud as quickly as possible. Reading is faster if the prime is semantically related to the target.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading