Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Sampling Theory

Communication research deals with questions such as “How are political issues framed?” or “What effect does violent television content have on its viewers?” These and many other questions apply to a particular population to which researchers want to generalize their results (e.g., all articles selected for a newspaper issue; all television viewers of a nation): the target population. In the first step of every empirical research design, this target population needs to be defined. Sometimes, the population will be small enough to be included entirely in the study. Yet, in many cases, the population is too large to be covered completely, due to time or financial constraints—or simply because it is virtually impossible to do so (e.g., when the target population is an entire nation). Then, a sample has to be drawn in such a way that the parameters of that sample accurately represent the entire target population. This “miniature” is under investigation in research, and from this, researchers extrapolate to the target population. Hence, an accurate sampling enables researchers to make statements about a population and to draw conclusions without having to investigate the whole population.

A sample consists of several elements (also called units). These elements could be objects (e.g., newspaper articles), events (e.g., press conferences), or individuals and groups of individuals (e.g., persons, households, organizations). Sampling is defined as the process of selecting those elements from a list (or quasi-list) of the members of a population, the so-called sampling frame. Although researchers aim at selecting a sample that matches the target population perfectly, there is no such thing as the perfect sample. The sampling procedure is always prone to errors, which affect its quality. Against a common misconception, it is first the quality of the sampling procedure and the resulting sample and not its size alone that affects its generalizability, the extent to which the findings can be applied to the target population.

This entry discusses the most common sampling procedures and respective potential biases and errors. The basic logic of the procedures described in this entry applies to all kinds of samples. Yet, if the elements are individuals (and not objects or events) the fact that not all units will respond becomes a specific issue. This enhances potential biases of the sample.

Sampling Procedures

There are two ways of sampling, probability and nonprobability sampling. Only probability samples allow for extrapolation of the results to the target population based on inferential statistics. In probability samples, all units have a calculable, nonzero probability of being selected for the sample. In nonprobability samples, units of the population do not have an equal chance of being selected. Thus, it is possible that they do not represent the target population very accurately, or at all. A common example of a nonprobability sample is a convenience sample. Often utilized in experimental research, the researcher simply selects readily available units (which in many cases results in a student sample). Further examples are snowball sampling (referrals from initial subjects are used to generate additional subjects) or expert sampling. Nonprobability samples are usually chosen due to time or financial constraints or simply because the researcher is not interested in parameters of the entire population. For instance, within an experimental design, researchers are often concerned with testing the internal validity of a theoretical approach by conducting a causality test. A compromise between the two ways of sampling is quota sampling, which is primarily used in survey research. Based on parameters known for the target population (e.g., age, gender, education), a specified proportion of each predefined strata (usually the representative share for the target population) is sampled. Hereby, the interviewer selects the units based on the given quotas, resulting in a nonrandom sample. Although widely used in research practice, the basic assumptions of inferential statistics are violated for quota sampling—like for all nonprobability samples.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading