Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Religious Communication

Religious communication may be either (a) communication acts informed by religious believers’ understanding of their faith (e.g., believers discussing their faith among themselves, explaining their faith to others) or (b) communication acts about religious belief when the communicator does not share those beliefs (e.g., a Hindu discussing Judaism, an atheist arguing against all religious belief). Researchers study both types of communication events, though the history of the field through the early 21st century has focused more generally on the first, and this seems to be what most researchers think of when they consider religious communication. All communication studies examine some aspect of how thought, language, and social conditions interact. In religious communication, these interactions are explored under some of their most extreme conditions, as believers attempt to push symbol systems past their limits and describe the indescribable. This makes religious communication an extremely rich focus for researchers.

Whether focused on religious communication by a believer or communication about religious belief, the area of religious communication has two specific challenges that all researchers must consider in order to choose appropriate methodologies, understand their artifacts and data, and work effectively in the field: the issues of transcendence and reductionism. These challenges (but especially the first) mark the unique nature of research in religious communication. This entry first defines religion before examining the various approaches to studying the transcendent nature of religious communication. The roles that reductionism and fanaticism play in religious communication research are then explored.

Religion

Religion is an organized system of understanding and action based upon specific convictions about ultimate reality. Generally, religions hold that there are realities outside of nature, beyond matter and material reactions, apart from time and space. Most religious systems are distinguished from one another by differences in what they believe this reality beyond nature is like: what are its attributes and its relationships to the world of nature? To be clear, religion is not a belief in “extra dimensions” such as one finds in the theories of a multiverse; such dimensions would, in the end, be only another complex aspect of nature itself. Rather, religion is a belief that, once every aspect, force, dimension, condition, and material cause within nature is known, not everything is known.

Transcendence

Since religious claims focus on qualities outside of nature, they are claims about transcendent realities beyond human sensory experience, as religious believers themselves acknowledge. Lao Tsu, for example, opens his meditations by observing that the Tao which can be discussed is not the actual Tao. The monotheistic religions also portray the one God as beyond all telling; this claim that the divine is beyond the scope of human intellect and language might be considered a hallmark of virtually every religious tradition.

Arguably, this makes religious discourse the most extreme challenge in communication studies. What is the relationship of symbol systems to an incomprehensible reality? Can one meaningfully discuss realities that are beyond the grasp of language? Religious thinkers from Plato to Ibn-Sina to Aquinas to Zhiyi insist this is possible, and most believers follow a series of recognizable approaches to craft communication in the face of incommunicable reality.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading