Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Literature, Determining Quality of

It is important when determining quality of literature to distinguish among different types of literature. There are significant differences between academic sources like journals, books, and encyclopedia entries, and nonacademic sources like popular press magazines and newspapers. One of the first distinctions to make is the difference between academic and nonacademic sources. Typically, researchers will want to cite academic sources in their research articles because they are more credible than nonacademic sources, which are written for the general public. Gathering and citing information from a peer-reviewed, academic journal for which the researcher has collected data and the resulting article reporting the data has undergone a rigorous review process by one’s peers to ensure that the study is ethical and rigorous is very different than a journalist providing information on a subject for a magazine or newspaper written for the lay public (e.g., Glamour or Men’s Health). Even though the information in popular press magazines might be accurate and valuable, it usually is not as credible as going directly to the original source of a research study. Sometimes journalists interview scholars about their research, but they often do not report all of the necessary information about a study’s goals and methods for the reader to accurately determine how the study was conducted and whether the results are valid. Even sources that are scholarly but written for the general public, like Psychology Today, usually do not provide enough information in their articles to judge the credibility of the research. Sometimes one can use information, like statistics, from certain popular press magazines (e.g., Time, Newsweek, or the Wall Street Journal) as an attention catcher to draw one’s audience into the article. However, that information can be gathered from a more reliable source, such as the U.S. Census Bureau or another outlet where valid statistics were collected. This entry examines the differences between journals and books and between different types of articles, how to assess the quality of evidence presented in different types of publications, and how to conduct a literature search.

Journals, Books, and Article Types

It is also important to differentiate between journals and books. Journal articles typically include more up-to-date research because books take longer to be published. Journal articles generally also include more empirical data than books, which might provide more solid evidence for the topic at hand. At the same time, books and book chapters are often cited in articles because they provide seminal or foundational information about a topic. Researchers will typically use articles, but include books and book chapters for conceptual information about a topic. Scholars also generally prefer to cite empirical journal articles and chapters over encyclopedia entries. Encyclopedia entries provide definitional information about a subject and/or an overview of the research in a specific area, but they typically do not report empirical data or go into a great amount of depth about a subject.

Finally, it is important to distinguish among different types of research articles. Some journals might not be peer-reviewed whereas others may not include data. When examining journals, it is important to look at the impact factor of the journal, the aims of the journal, and the publisher (see the following section). It is also important to rely on articles that have empirical data, in addition to pieces that are a review of the literature. Within review articles, there is also considerable variance. Some scholars simply review a body of literature, whereas other scholars provide a more systematic review of the literature and still others conduct a meta-analysis. Articles tend to be more rigorous when the author provides a systematic assessment of how he or she narrowed the search for articles. Meta-analyses are also very rigorous reviews of literature that provide evidence of the strength of a set of findings across a body of work. It involves narrowing down a search to a specific set of articles that meet certain scientific standards and then using statistics to examine the “effect sizes” or power of the findings or strength of the effects across those articles.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading