Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Institutional Review Board

The institutional review board (IRB) is the oversight committee within an organization (e.g., a hospital or university) that ensures that all research conducted with human subjects is ethical, has an appropriate level of risk, and that participants in the study consent to be involved. This board ensures institutional compliance with federal standards for conducting ethical biomedical or behavioral research. To ensure institutional compliance, no research involving people can be conducted without approval of the IRB. Federal funding for research can be withdrawn if individuals or institutions do not comply with the federal guidelines for ethical conduct and the protection of research subjects. Thus, the IRB reviews research applications, can require modifications, approves or rejects proposed research plans, and continues to monitor all research within the institution from inception through publication and data storage.

A history of abuse established the need to protect the rights and welfare of research participants, especially those populations that are least able to protect themselves (e.g., prisoners, minors, and pregnant women). The rights of participants are protected by the IRB, specifically the right to voluntary consent, privacy at each stage of the research process, and avoidance of undue physical, mental, or emotional distress. The critical scrutiny of each research project by the IRB is meant to ensure that research meets a minimum scientific, regulatory, and ethical standard. This entry offers a brief history of IRBs and discusses how IRBs approve research proposals.

Brief History

In 1947, 26 Nazi physicians were tried in Nuremburg, Germany, for conducting experiments on prisoners of war. The outcome of the Nazi War Crime Tribunal was a document known as the Nuremberg Code, the first internationally recognized standards for research ethics. The Nuremberg Code established that any participation in experimental research must give consent to participate in the research. This code also established the standard that benefits of the research must outweigh the risks. The Nuremberg Code did not carry the force of the law in any country; rather, it is the first document to advocate for voluntary participation and informed consent.

Other experiments that took place between 1930 and 1970 reinforced the need for a standard code of ethics for research with human subjects in the United States. A series of experiments in Tuskegee, Alabama, that spanned 40 years prevented poor Black men with syphilis from treatment and information about treatment options even after a cure had been established. These men were given free medical examinations, but not given information about their condition. A cure for syphilis (penicillin) became available in the 1950s. Some subjects were informed about their disease by doctors from outside of the research study and offered treatment, but in some cases the researchers intervened to prevent the treatment. The experiment was not stopped until 1973 when public knowledge of the study led to political embarrassment for the U.S. government.

The use of thalidomide is another example of the need for research oversight. In the late 1950s, thalidomide had been approved in Europe but not by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a sedative and for controlling nausea. Physicians in the United States prescribed thalidomide to pregnant women. It was discovered that taking the drug during pregnancy led to severe deformities in the fetus. Some 12,000 babies were born with severe deformities. The women who were prescribed thalidomide did not know the drug was not approved by the FDA, nor did they give consent to be part of an experimental study. As a result of thalidomide, in 1962 the Kefauver-Harris Bill was passed in the United States to ensure greater drug safety.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading