Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Individual differences refer to the reality that human beings are unique and cannot be expected to behave or respond uniformly. When doing research in the field of communication, this means that although a researcher is trying to develop and support a predictive truth about a certain phenomenon, his or her findings will likely be tempered by the reality that what happens will to some extent depend on the characteristics of the individual person involved. Communication research does not necessarily result in universal truths, the way a hard science like chemistry or physics does. Instead, it generates statistical generalizations or predictions of probable outcomes that may vary based on differences across people. These differences can be in one’s personality, abilities, preferences, and interests. There are several challenges associated with such differences that will be discussed in this entry, including why and when individual differences matter in communication research, how they affect research design, and in what contexts they play an important role.

People vary on a range of attributes. In addition to physical and demographic differences, such as age, height, or marital status, there are numerous internal human characteristics across which there is likely to be a broad range of variance, even among people who are outwardly similar. For example, people can vary on intelligence, on the degree of self-confidence they possess, or on their motivation to succeed at a particular task.

Why Individual Differences Matter

Communication researchers search for patterns in human behavior in an effort to describe this behavior, but their goal is often more than just description. They would like to predict and explain the behavior. This is because ultimately, most researchers hope their explanations and predictions can be used to improve the human condition to create better societies and better lives. For example, communication researchers aware of the rate of traffic fatalities among young drivers might feel their work could have value in encouraging safer driving among this age group (e.g., by encouraging seat belt use). Description is often a researcher’s primary goal. They might look for patterns in what type of public service announcement (PSA) resonates most with the particular target audience of American teenagers. However, more than just describing what types of PSAs are most popular or most watched among this group, the researchers would also like to be able to explain how or why a certain style of PSA is popular with them, so that this knowledge can be used to design effective PSAs with vital health or safety information, or to predict which, out of several competing styles of PSAs, is most likely to be attended to by them.

Of course, it is not the case that all American teenagers are going to respond similarly to a PSA or any other public health or safety message. Individual differences in how someone was raised, their level of emotional maturity, their mood at the time of receiving the message, and other factors will play a role in whether the message is noticed and to what extent it is persuasive. For this reason, individual differences help explain and predict human behavior and other outcomes, and knowledge about them is valued by researchers.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading