Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Debate and forensics are academic activities in which participants compete against each other in a chosen event that requires some aspect of communication, namely public speaking. That aspect of public speaking might involve the construction of arguments, the presentation of evidence and research, acting, storytelling, or responding to a particular prompt. Each year, a large variety of types of competitive speech and debate activities occur at tournaments held across the United States. Tournaments exist for students in middle school, high school, and college. Research often refers to debate and forensics as a type of experimental learning in which participants actively learn by doing and by putting theory into practice. That is, participants learn as they prepare to speak, speak, and interact with others outside of the walls of the classroom. This entry provides an overview of debate and forensics activities, introduces questions that researchers interested in debate and forensics seek to answer, and also describes how researchers work to answer those questions.

What Are Debate and Forensics?

In debate, individuals or teams argue against and compete with other teams with the goal of convincing a judge or judges that they produced the best arguments. Debaters engage with the opposing team and attempt to refute the claims presented by their opponents. The topics for debates are selected before the competition begins. For example, for one type of debate, policy debate, the topic for the entire year is decided before the competition season begins. Policy debate topics have involved nuclear weapons policy, ocean exploration, military presence in foreign countries, immigration reform, and domestic surveillance. These topics are called resolutions and are written as propositions, such as “Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance.” Typically, during the debate, one team, called the affirmative team, will attempt to uphold the resolution, arguing that the resolution is correct. Then, the other team, called the negative team, will attempt to disprove the resolution, refuting the affirmative’s argument in support of the resolution.

The several types of debate include Lincoln–Douglas debate, policy debate, public forum debate, and congressional debate. In Lincoln–Douglas debate, there are two participants—one on each side. Lincoln–Douglas generally involves debates about values, such as what is more important: individual liberty or the collective good. Policy debate and public forum debate both have four participants—two on each side. Because the topic for policy debate is the same throughout the year, participants in policy debate research one topic in extreme detail as they debate that topic over the course of the season. The topic for public forum changes every month, so public forum debaters research more topic areas but generally with less depth than policy debaters. These types of debate are further differentiated by the amount of time each participant has to speak. For example, the first speech in high school policy debate is 8 minutes in length, but the first speech in high school public forum debate is 4 minutes. The first speaker in a Lincoln–Douglas debate gets 6 minutes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading