Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Controversial Experiments

Controversial experiments are projects involving human participants that lead to a questioning of the ethical design and implementation of the project. Ethics are understood as a set of moral guidelines. In the instance of a controversial experiment, the moral treatment of the human (or other living) participants has been an issue of concern. Numerous projects in social and medical sciences rely on the use of human participants to observe a phenomenon, study behaviors under certain conditions, and establish the effectiveness of medical treatments. However, the experiment must ensure the physical, mental, and emotional health of participants. Researchers need to reduce and alleviate risks to participants both during and after the experiment. In cases when risk cannot be avoided, it should be minimized, with participants made aware of the potential risk involved in the experiment.

Each academic institution or agency relies on an institutional review board (IRB) to determine if the proposed experiment meets ethical guidelines, minimizes risk, and offers resources needed to ensure the well-being of participants. The need to ensure the protection of human participants is more recent than might be expected and was developed out of legislature from 1974. Severe violations in human rights and safety during controversial experiments led to national standards for ethical research. The remainder of this entry provides additional information regarding crucial ethical concerns reflected by the IRB, gives detailed examples of experiments deemed controversial, and discusses how these investigations coincide or violate ethical guidelines.

IRB and Important Ethical Guidelines

The National Research Act was created in 1974 that led to the appointment of a national commission charged with protecting human subjects participating in research and the creation of ethical guidelines. These guidelines were described in the Belmont Report and legalized in 1978. To enforce the ethical standards, institutions created IRBs.

While extensive, there are three important ethical considerations detailed by the Belmont Report. The first consideration of the Belmont Report is that participants are treated with respect, and is enforced by the requirement for researchers to obtain informed consent from participants. Informed consent is information given to participants explaining any potential risks involving the research. The informed consent document should include detailed information about the purpose of the research without divulging information that would influence the results. Informed consent must be voluntary, and the person giving consent must have the comprehension, or ability to understand the information, to give consent.

The next ethical consideration is beneficence, or considerations of the potential benefits of the research. The potential benefits need to outweigh the risks to participants. Establishing beneficence establishes the value of the experiment as evidence for why it should occur. Finally, the third ethical consideration is justice, or fair standards the researchers used to target a particular sample population. Researchers need to explain why the chosen participant population is needed, as opposed to experiments that use a certain participant population because it is convenient.

The consideration of justice protects at-risk populations, or groups that could have difficulty understanding what the experiment involves or do not have full control over their decision to participate in the research. Based on these standards, children, individuals with disabilities, individuals who are incarcerated, and groups that constitute an ethnic or racial minority are considered at-risk populations. Unfortunately, previous experiments have exploited these populations, and the IRB requires a more complex review to ensure their protection. Looking at the criteria to protect human subjects can seem complicated, but examining controversial experiments provides an understanding of why they were developed. The next section provides examples of three controversial experiments conducted before the enactment of the Belmont Report, and explains how they coincide or conflict with the ethical guidelines of experiments that are followed today.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading