Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Validity, History of

Validity is arguably one of the most important, yet widely misunderstood, concepts in educational measurement, research, and evaluation. Misconceptions about validity may partly be due to the fact that the term validity has distinct meanings both between and within academic disciplines. Even within educational research, validity is described differently within the context of experimental design than it is within measurement. To make matters more complicated, the concept of validity has continued to evolve within the field of educational measurement, and it is this latter domain that is the focus of the present entry.

The concept of validity has changed from a simple typology believed to be a property of tests to a unified concept reflecting the extent to which evidence and theory support score-based interpretations and proposed uses of a test. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing—hereafter referred to as the Standards—provides a vantage point to frame this discussion about the history of validity. As of 2017, the Standards, including the technical recommendations serving as a forefather of this publication, have been revised 6 times since 1952, with the most recent version published in 2014. For the sake of simplicity, the concept of validity is described across three historical periods. This entry first discusses the concept of validity prior to the 1950s, which emphasized correlational evidence as well as test content. This is followed by the introduction of construct validity in the early 1950s as one of three types (i.e., criterion, content, and construct). Next, this entry discusses the unification of validity beginning in the 1970s throughout the 1990s and concludes with a brief outline of contemporary perspectives toward this concept.

The Concept of Validity Prior to the 1950s

Validity theory has primarily been a concern among theorists in education and other social sciences. The advent of validity theory within these disciplines coincides with early efforts to legitimize the practice of educational and psychological measurement as a scientific activity. As educational and psychological testing became more prominent in the early 1900s, theorists sought to provide an account of validity to justify the consequential actions derived from test scores. Two developments influenced conceptions of validity before the publication of the first technical recommendations in 1952: The formalization of the correlation coefficient and concerns raised by educational researchers about the connection between test content and validity. Both developments are consistent with the view that tests themselves are valid or invalid.

Correlations, which reflect the direction and magnitude of a relationship between two variables, are crucial for making empirical predictions. The formalization of the correlation coefficient led to the concept of criterion-related validity. Criterion-related validity was a concern when researchers were interested in using a test as an indication of a criterion of ultimate interest. The criterion of interest may reflect the future or current status on a variable. Tests were therefore viewed as valid for anything with which it correlated. However, educational researchers indicated that the criterion-related view failed to address the role of test content. These researchers argued that the content of a test, such as an achievement test, should be evaluated for its relevance to, and representation of, a specified domain. In sum, prior to the 1950s, validity was largely viewed as two distinct, though in some sense connected, types which included criterion-related validity and content validity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading