Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Thurstone Scaling

One of the earliest data collection methods for the measurement of attitudes is Thurstone’s law of comparative judgment (LCJ). The LCJ, which has its roots in psychophysical scaling, first develops a large number of attitude statements or stimuli and then uses information from judges to place the stimuli along a unidimensional continuum. There are three methods for collecting data from the judges: the method of equal-appearing intervals, the method of paired comparisons, and the method of successive intervals. After the scale positions of the stimuli have been determined, the stimuli are presented to research subjects or respondents whose attitudes are then measured. The average position of the items endorsed by a particular respondent serves as the estimate of the respondent’s latent attitude. After providing background information, this entry further explores Thurstone’s LCJ and discusses alternative methods.

Background

A large part of social psychology focuses on the study of attitudes. Attitude research covers a wide variety of topics, such as racism, sexism, attitudes about school, religion, politics, among others. Unlike weight, height, or age, attitudes are not easily quantified, complicating the social research questions at hand. Moreover, there is a great deal of confusion and ambiguity attached to the concept of attitude. In fact, few social psychologists even agree on the definition of attitude. In his early work, in 1928, Louis Thurstone defines attitude as “the sum total of a man’s inclination and feelings, prejudices and bias, preconceived notions, ideas, fears, threats, and convictions about any specified topic” (p. 531).

Attitudes are simply one of many hypothetical constructs used in the social sciences. They are unobservable and therefore cannot be measured directly. If attitudes could be observed directly, then studying the relationships between attitudes and other variables of interest would be straightforward. Although attitudes cannot be observed directly, hundreds of methods for quantifying attitudes have been suggested in the psychological measurement literature.

One of the earliest methods for the measurement of attitudes was suggested by Thurstone in his 1928 paper, “Attitudes Can Be Measured.” As in Thurstone’s originally proposed methods, most attitude measurement methods assume that the range of attitudes falls on a single bipolar continuum or scale. This continuum can represent attitudes such as the liberal, conservative political scale, levels of prejudice, or how important a student thinks studying is, and countless others.

Assuming the attitude of interest lies on a unidimensional scale, the goal of attitude scaling is to estimate the position of individuals on the continuum. Scaling starts by constructing or selecting a set of items or stimuli that represent varying levels of the attitude. Items can be physical objects, but are usually a set of opinion statements, the verbal expressions of attitude. “All college students should be required to take a statistics course” is an example of an opinion statement that might be used to study attitudes about the importance of studying statistics. Once a set of items that the researcher believes and measures the attitude, or attribute of interest, is constructed, the locations of the stimuli and individuals’ attitudes along the unidimensional continuum are estimated. Thurstone’s LCJ is one of the earliest methods to accomplish this goal.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading