Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean, or regression to the mean, is a statistical phenomenon that is often observed in student assessment and repeated measurements research in different branches of science. Regression toward the mean is present whenever a construct that is being measured is not accessible directly but is estimated by using methods that are not absolutely reliable. This is the case in the vast majority of measurements in social sciences, education, and students’ assessment. Observations with extreme values in the first measurement will tend to be closer to the mean in the second measurement, and extreme observations in the second measurement will tend to be closer to the mean in the first measurement, whenever two variables are not perfectly correlated.

Regression toward the mean must be seriously considered when designing scientific studies and data analysis to avoid making incorrect inferences. This phenomenon is observed both on a subject level and on a group level. It is caused by random fluctuations in the subjects and by nonrandom sampling of a group from the population.

The observed result of a measurement is the sum of unobserved real value and a random error of measurement. A random error influences single observations but does not affect the mean value of the whole set of observations (assuming that the sample was randomly drawn from the population). If the real value did not change between two measurements, it is expected that mean values for those two measurements stay the same. In each measurement, some observations are below the true value and others are above it. The observed value changes due to random error of measurement.

This entry presents basic information about regression toward the mean. After providing background information, it shows how this phenomenon could influence research at the subject level and at the group level and how to deal with this effect.

Background

The term regression to the mean was coined by 19th-century scientist Sir Francis Galton, probably best known for his works on eugenics. Galton observed that extreme height in parents is not passed completely to their offspring and he considered it a genetic phenomenon. Galton called it reversion to the mean or reversion to mediocrity. The difference in height between parents and their child is proportional to the parents’ deviation from typical height in the population. Height of offspring shifts toward the mediocre point, which was identified as the mean value of height in the population.

Cognitive psychologist and 2002 Nobel Prize laureate in economics Daniel Kahneman uses regression toward the mean as an explanation of a common belief that rebukes seem to improve performance and praises seem to diminish it. Kahneman illustrates with an example of flight instructors: A flight school had adopted a policy of consistent positive reinforcement recommended by psychology experts, whereby each successfully executed flight maneuver of a cadet was verbally reinforced by flight instructors with a praise. After some experience with this policy, the instructors claimed that positive reinforcement is not optimal for cadets because they tended to make mistakes right after positive reinforcement took place. On the contrary, cadets punished after a bad execution tended to perform better next time. This claim is based on instructors’ experience; it does not take into account regression toward the mean phenomenon. It is simply more viable that after a successful maneuver, the next execution will be less successful.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading