Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Primary Trait Scoring

Primary trait scoring is an approach for evaluating constructed responses, in which scores are based on one or more specific aspects of performance that are essential for the successful completion of the tested task. Primary trait scoring is most typically associated with writing assessment and was originally developed by Richard Lloyd-Jones and colleagues in the early 1970s to score writing in the U.S. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP); since then, it has been used in a variety of contexts such as task-based assessment of second languages. As originally formulated, a key assumption of primary trait scoring was that different types of writing tasks and contexts have different criteria for success. Therefore, it is necessary during test design to carefully define the types of tasks needed to assess the ability of interest and to produce scoring materials that focus on the specific performance aspects that contribute most to the task being assessed. An implication of this specificity is that scoring rubrics may not necessarily generalize across different task types. This entry describes the characteristics of primary trait scoring, along with the strengths and weaknesses of this approach to assessment.

Characteristics

As the name suggests, primary trait scoring targets a limited number of key features of performance that are considered most important for success. Strictly speaking, a score is awarded on the basis of a single criterion, although complex tasks may receive several scores using different rubrics, each addressing a distinct element of performance; multiple rubrics were in fact how primary trait scoring was operationalized in NAEP writing assessments.

As originally conceived, primary trait scoring is more accurately described as an approach to assessment rather than simply a scoring method. The primary trait approach is characterized by a concern for the test taker’s ability to successfully complete specific tasks that reflect the real-world situations. Rather than viewing assessment tasks as devices for eliciting a generalizable sample of performance, performance is viewed as task specific. Contextual factors are considered critical for understanding what success means for the task, so the task context should be clearly specified. For example, in writing assessment, contextual features such as the audience and purpose for writing (e.g., persuading a peer or describing a concept to a lay audience) should be made explicit in task design and the instructions to test takers. A full implementation of a primary trait scoring approach would therefore incorporate a focus on tasks not just in scoring but at the test design and development stages as well.

Development of a primary trait scoring system starts with selecting the tasks to be tested, which in turn entails a classification system to identify the tasks needed to cover the domain targeted by the assessment. In the NAEP assessment, for example, a model of discourse was used to identify particular rhetorical functions (e.g., persuasion, description, and personal expression) that were felt to be important for student writing. Once such a framework has been established, prototype tasks are developed and test-taker samples are collected. Scoring criteria are then developed based on the performances elicited from test takers and also informed by theoretical or empirical understanding of the requirements to successfully complete the task. Scoring criteria should be limited in number but should cover key elements required for success in the task, and ideally, scoring criteria should be useful for informing teaching and learning.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading