Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Multidimensional Item Response Theory

Item response theory (IRT) is a core analysis for test developers and researchers working with questionnaires, surveys, psychological measures of mood and cognition, and educators interested in academic achievement. It serves to provide information about both items and individuals in a comprehensive, connected framework. Basic IRT models make an assumption that the set of items measures a single common construct, such as intelligence. However, in reality, many constructs are multidimensional in nature, meaning that they consist of what can be thought of as several subconstructs. Standard IRT techniques are not able to accurately model such item responses because of their assumption of unidimensionality. For this reason, researchers working with multidimensional constructs need an alternative modeling paradigm, which comes in the form of multidimensional IRT (MIRT). This entry first briefly review unidimensional IRT models and then extend those to the multidimensional context by focusing on two popular ways in which these models can be viewed. The entry concludes by describing software options that researchers have when trying to fit MIRT models.

Unidimensional IRT Models

Unidimensional IRT refers to a set of statistical models designed for use with responses to items on tests, questionnaires, and other such instruments in order to obtain estimates of individuals’ levels on the construct measured by the scale as a whole. For example, a commonly used model is the three-parameter logistic (3PL) model, which contains a parameter specific to respondents (person parameter) and three parameters specific to the items measuring the construct of interest. The person parameter is the estimate of the latent trait being measured by the scale (e.g., reading ability and depression) and is referred to as θ. The item parameters include (a) location on the latent trait scale, (b) the item’s ability to differentiate among individuals with different levels of the construct, and (c) the likelihood that an individual will endorse the item due solely to chance. The construct itself is a latent variable that is measured by the set of items, which serve the role of indicators much as do the observed variables in factor analysis models. Indeed, there is a direct relationship between IRT and factor analysis models and their parameters, so that one can be easily converted to the other. IRT models can be divided into two broad families based on whether they model dichotomous item responses with two categories or polytomous items with three or more categories.

The simplest unidimensional IRT model is the Rasch model, which is expressed as

Pxj=1|θ,bj=eθ,bj1+eθ,bj.

In Equation 1, xj is the response to item j with 1 being correct in the context of an achievement test and 0 being incorrect. An individual’s level of the latent trait being measured by the set of items is represented by θ, and the item location is bj. For a math test, θ corresponds to an examinee’s math ability while bj is the difficulty of item j. For a depression inventory, θ would be the patient’s level of depression and bj the likelihood of an individual endorsing the behavior measured by item j. An important strength of all IRT models is that item difficulty and examinee ability are placed on the same scale. Therefore, it is possible to directly compare where an individual lies on the latent trait scale with the location of any item on the instrument. In addition, b and θ are both centered at 0, which represents average or typical location for both.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading