Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Median Test

A very simple design in quantitative research involves the random allocation of a sample of N individuals to two different groups. The groups are exposed to different treatments, and the research question is whether there is any difference between the two groups on some criterion variable. Classically, this question is addressed using Student’s t test for independent groups or the equivalent one-way between-subjects analysis of variance. However, this procedure assumes that the criterion variable in question (a) is measured on an interval or ratio scale, (b) is normally distributed, and (c) has the same variance in both of the groups. The median test was devised for use in situations in which one or more of these assumptions is not met. This entry describes the derivation of the median test, examines different ways of analyzing the contingency tables that result, and concludes by discussing the test’s power and power efficiency.

Origins of the Median Test

The median of a set of scores is a measure of their central tendency defined as the value below which 50% of the scores fall. If the number of scores is odd, the median is the centermost score when they are ranked from the lowest to the highest. If the number of scores is even, the median is the average of the two centermost scores when they are ranked from the lowest to the highest.

The median test is employed to test the null hypothesis that the scores obtained by two independent groups are drawn from populations with the same median. The first step is to find the overall median of the combined data (i.e., without regard to group membership). The scores within each group are then categorized in terms of whether they fall above or below the overall median. If the null hypothesis is true, then roughly half of the scores in each group should fall above the overall median and half should fall below the overall median. If the null hypothesis is false, the proportions in question would be expected to be different. Table 1 shows the outcome in a schematic form. This is simply an example of a 2 × 2 contingency table.

Table 1 Schematic Form of Data for the Median Test

Group 1

Group 2

Total

Number of scores above combined median

A

B

A + B

Number of scores below combined median

C

D

C + D

Total number

A + C

B + D

N

Source: Adapted from Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (p. 111). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Copyright by the McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

The median test was first described by Dutch biologist Jacob Westenberg in 1948. He referred to the earlier writings of Ronald A. Fisher on the analysis of 2 × 2 contingency tables and advocated the use of the Fisher exact probability test (described later in this entry) to analyze data of the sort shown in Table 1. Westenberg’s initial account assumed that the two groups being compared contained the same number of cases (so that the total number of cases was by definition an even number), but in 1950, he published a more general account allowing for unequal sample sizes. The same year, a U.S. statistician, Alexander M. Mood, independently derived the median test. He proposed that the Fisher exact probability test should be used to analyze the resulting contingency table if either group contained 10 cases or fewer, but that for larger samples, Karl Pearson’s chi-square test could be used instead. One of Mood’s colleagues, George W. Brown, demonstrated how the median test could be extended to encompass designs involving more than two groups. In this case, Pearson’s chi-square test would have to be used.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading