Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Internal Evaluation

Internal evaluation refers to an evaluation conducted by an organization or program/project staff in which the evaluators are directly accountable to the organization being evaluated. As such, the primary responsibility for the internal evaluation lies with the organization itself. This differs from an external evaluation, which is an evaluation conducted by evaluators from outside of the organization being examined. Internal evaluation (sometimes referred to as in-house evaluation) is essential for organization and program management, as the emphasis is on the concerns and needs of the organization’s administrators, managers, and staff to assist the program managers in better understanding their program theory and improving program processes and outcomes. Furthermore, the internal evaluation process promotes utilization of evaluation findings, reflective practice, and organizational learning.

Michael Scriven points out that the distinction between internal and external evaluation is more of a difference of degree than of kind. For example, if the evaluators hail from the same organization but from a different program or department, they may be considered partially external. Another example of a combined internal–external evaluation is institution or program accreditation in which the internal evaluators conduct a self-assessment, collecting and organizing data for external evaluators appointed by the accrediting organization. The accrediting body then inspects the data collected by the internal evaluators, conducts site visits, and writes an independent evaluation report. In fact, a typical accreditation criterion is that the institution or program seeking accreditation should use the findings from its internal evaluations. This entry examines the history, application, models, history, benefits, and limitations of internal evaluation.

History

During the 1960s and 1970s, evaluation emerged as a profession, yet few organizations had evaluations units and even those that did still relied heavily on contracts with external evaluators. But as professional evaluation grew, there were increasing legislative mandates for the training of evaluators. Likely a result of the perceived importance of evaluation, throughout the 1980s, organizations experienced a notable shift from an emphasis on external evaluation to a focus on internal evaluation; thus, internal evaluation became more commonplace. Strengthening this shift, the passage of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 required that all U.S. federal agencies develop strategic plans that described their overall goals and objectives, annual performance plans that included quantifiable measures of progress, and performance reports that described successes. In the 2000s, most federal, state, and local agencies as well as international organizations had internal evaluation units. In fact, evaluation scholars estimate that in North America, approximately half to three quarters of all evaluations are internal.

Application

Internal evaluation is typically used for formative purposes, as the evaluators usually make recommendations and action plans for improving the program; because the evaluators are on staff, they can monitor the implementation of the changes to ensure that the suggestions are converted to action. Nevertheless, internal evaluations can also be summative as is the case for an organization that conducts an evaluation for decision-making purposes, such as, for example, to determine whether or not to continue a program, project, or initiative or for holding its staff accountable to certain standards or practices.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading