Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (HLM) is a specialized statistical software program for analyzing multilevel and longitudinal data. It is published by Stephen Raudenbush, Anthony Bryk, and Richard Congdon and distributed by the Scientific Software International, Inc. (Chicago, IL). The program’s original versions came out in the early 1980s. The design of the program—its modeling modules and options, input specifications, and output—is in close coordination with the textbook written by Raudenbush and Bryk, Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. The following entry describes the analytical options, estimation approaches, inferential methods, and operational and output features of HLM.

Modeling Modules

HLM has eight modeling modules. They differ according to (a) the levels of hierarchy, (b) the type and the number of outcomes, and (c) the nature of the hierarchy.

The Levels of Hierarchy

HLM allows users to model data sets that have two to four levels of hierarchy. For each level, there is a submodel with its own structural and random components. The structural component represents, at that level, the relations among variables, and the random component denotes the residual variability. In a school effects study in which the sample consists of students clustered within schools, for example, there are two levels of nesting and subsequently two submodels. With i = 1,…,nj students (Level-1 units) nested within j = 1,…, J schools (Level-2 units), the first sub- or Level-1 model for the achievement of student i in school j, Achij can be represented as:

Achij=β0j+q=1QβqjXqij+rij

where the structural component consists of the intercept, β0j, and the Level-1 coefficients and predictors, βqj and Xqij(q = 1,…,Q). The random component is denoted by rij, which is assumed to be normally distributed with a variance of σ2. Some Level-1 predictor examples are family socioeconomic status (SES), gender, and prior achievement. A given βqj relates the qth predictor to the achievement outcome. Letting the qth predictor be SES, the coefficient βqj will thus index the strength and direction of the student SES-achievement association for school j.

The second sub- or Level-2 model predicts the intercept, β0j, and the Level-1 coefficients βqj. For the intercept and the qth Level-1 coefficient, the model can generally be represented as:

β0j=γ00+s=1S0γ0sWsj+u0jβqj=γq0+s=1SqγqsWsj+uqj,

where the structural component consists of the intercepts, γ00 and γq0, and the Level-2 coefficients and predictors, γ0s, γqs, and Wsj (s = 1,…,S0 or q). The random component is denoted by u0j and uqj, which are assumed to be distributed as bivariate normal with dispersion T. The matrix T contains the variance and covariance components τ00, τqq, and τq0. Some Level-2 predictor examples are school type (private vs. public), school SES, and curricular policies. The parameter γ0s and a given γqs relate the sth school-level predictor to the Level-1 intercept and the qth Level-1 coefficient, respectively. Letting sth school-level predictor be school type, a researcher can use it to model the Level-1 intercept, β0j, and assess how it relates to school achievement. The relationship will be captured by γ0s. The same predictor can also be used to model a given βqj, for example, the coefficient for SES, to see if the SES-achievement associations vary between the two types of schools or, equivalently, whether school type moderates the relationships between student SES and achievement. The estimate of γqs captures this moderating effect.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading