Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Feminist Evaluation

Feminist evaluation is an approach to program evaluation that emerged as a distinct model at the end of the 1990s. Feminist evaluation draws from rich literatures of feminist theory and feminist research methods in the social sciences, philosophy of science, liberal arts, and natural sciences. An initial impetus behind the articulation of a feminist evaluation model was a recognition of the negative consequences of lack of attention to gender and gender inequities in conceptualizing, designing, conducting, and analyzing data from program evaluations. These gender inequities that result in social injustice are placed at the center of the feminist evaluation model. The model development grew to encompass principles about evaluation, knowledge, discrimination, and ways of knowing. Feminist evaluation is different from, but shares values with, other evaluation models; the controversies that have arisen over the model have tended to focus on use of the term feminist, the range of possible roles for the evaluator, and whether one has to identify ideologically as a feminist to conduct a feminist evaluation. As feminist theory and feminism have garnered the attention of a new generation, the term feminism and its aims are being reformed, resulting in the continued development of feminist evaluation as a model. This entry examines the origins of the approach, how feminist evaluation is situated within the greater landscape of evaluation models, eight feminist evaluation principles, and the dimensions and controversies of feminist evaluation.

The Origins of Feminist Evaluation

Feminist evaluation draws from rich, engaged philosophical, methodological, and epistemological literatures emerging from diverse disciplines. Contributions to theory and methods have come in what are sometimes described as waves of feminism; within the world of social science research, such trends are further understood within schools of thought. Each of these schools have critiqued the dominant research and methodological paradigms of its periods, posing challenges to epistemology (the nature and scope of knowledge), methodology, and ontology (the nature of being, reality, or existence).

Feminist empiricism was an early form of feminist theory that adhered to many of the tenets of positivism but critiqued androcentric perspectives that led to biased results. Later, standpoint theory critiqued positivism and encouraged the use of multiple standpoints as critical to gendered insights. Critical theory focused attention on power and domination; feminist postmodern and poststructural theories urged reconsideration of the possibility of objectivity. Global and postcolonial theories contributed an investigation into Western assumptions and the effects of the colonial past. Queer and lesbian, Black feminist, Chicana, indigenous, and race-focused theories examined, in different ways, biases, privilege, multifaceted identities, and how to engage adherents in discourses surrounding action against oppression. Each school drew from rich bodies of work, each significantly influenced multiple fields, and each has had its own critics.

Feminist Evaluation as Evaluation Model

Program evaluation is a form of applied research used to examine the merit, worth, value, or state of development of social interventions (programs). Program evaluation is transdisciplinary and has been influenced by diverse fields including educational psychology, sociology, statistics, and anthropology. In the 1960s, the evaluation profession began to develop in the United States and the diversity of disciplines from which practitioners hailed led to a number of different evaluation models or approaches to evaluation. The term model implies preferred approaches to data collection, ideas about what constitutes knowledge, concepts regarding what constitutes credible evidence, and perspectives about what can be known. Models also provide explicit or implicit perspectives on the relationship of the evaluator to stakeholders, the appropriate role of the evaluator, and the use of findings. Models emerge from practice, experience, and theoretical developments and are often created in response to perceived socioeconomic needs or dynamics.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading