Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Cost–Benefit Analysis

Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is a systematic approach used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of available options through a critical comparison of benefits and costs. Within the educational environment, this is a strategy used to evaluate the worth of educational programs and determine the added value in relationship to the monetary cost of the program. CBA has two overarching purposes: (1) to determine whether a program, investment, or decision is sound through verifying if its benefits overshadow the costs and by how much and (2) to provide a basis for comparing programs or projects by matching the total expected costs of each option against the total cost of benefits. Although one might assume that money is the driving force behind CBA, it is primarily used as protection for the well-being of individuals affected by the project or program. True economists want to measure the welfare, which is often a challenge because welfare cannot be directly measured. Instead, they use money as an expression of welfare and to assign “worth” to the program, allowing people to make decisions about programs based on this worth. Education is a form of investment in human capital, yielding economic benefits and contributing to the productive capacity of society. In this entry, how CBA is used in educational settings is analyzed. A comparison of CBA and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is also conducted. The steps of conducting a CBA are also provided. Finally, the entry examines how CBA research has supported the importance of quality preschool education programs and concludes with a debate about the overall benefits of CBA in education.

CBA and Education

Educational leaders and policy makers are often faced with determining the best educational programs to serve their students. Investment at any level involves a sacrifice of some type to secure future benefits. CBA is a particularly useful tool for examining these educational programs and interventions. The framework for CBA allows one to compare the costs and benefits to the various policies and/or program alternatives. This technique can be used as an attempt to compare the monetary value of benefits with the monetary value of costs. By calculating the costs and benefits of alternatives in terms of monetary values, it becomes easy to compare components such as rates of return on investment, net differences between costs and benefits, and benefit to cost ratios. The goal, however, would be for educational leaders to select programs that maximized the total benefits relative to costs.

To perform a CBA of alternatives, it is critical to assume that the benefits or outcomes can be valued by their market costs or comparable alternatives. Yet oftentimes programs in the social sciences do not have a market counterpart. For example, if a program is designed to improve student learning, how can one get a market price for student achievement? Benefits of a program, however, can be reflected by increased graduation rates and the added value of students being prepared for future college and career opportunities; it’s often difficult to quantify and place a monetary value on all of the benefits of a program.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading