Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s taxonomy is a multitiered model of classifying expected or intended educational learning objectives according to cognitive levels of complexity and mastery. Initially developed during the 1950s and later named after the American educational psychologist Benjamin S. Bloom, the model is concerned with the cognitive or thinking domain of learning. This entry describes both the original Bloom’s taxonomy and the revised version, which also classifies learning objectives by the types of knowledge used in thinking. The entry discusses specific changes made in terminology, structure, and emphasis in the revised version of the taxonomy and discusses the practical application of the taxonomy to the educational setting.

Bloom sought to provide a logical, progressive model that identified and classified all cognitive educational outcomes from simple to complex. Recognized by educational researchers and practitioners alike as an effective empirical model for measuring the cognitive or thinking domain of learning, Bloom’s taxonomy endures as a widely applied and taught framework across PreK–12 and higher education contexts.

Original Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom initiated the idea of creating a theoretical model of learning that sought to identify and classify all educational objectives during discussions that took place at the 1948 Convention of the American Psychological Association. Intended for university academics, Bloom hoped that in doing this work he could aid academics in reducing duplicate or redundant test items measuring the same educational learning objectives. Eight years later, Bloom and his colleagues followed through on his initial idea, identifying three domains of educational learning:

  • Cognitive: knowledge or thinking
  • Affective: attitude or self
  • Psychomotor: manual or physical skills

First published in 1956 under the title Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, the cognitive domain of learning was later renamed Bloom’s taxonomy after Bloom as the model’s primary developer. In education, the prime focus has been on Bloom’s cognitive domain of learning.

Bloom’s taxonomy is a hierarchical, six-tiered model of classifying thinking based on specific cognitive levels of complexity, starting from the simplest to most complex. The original six classification levels of the taxonomy are (1) knowledge, (2) comprehension, (3) application, (4) analysis, (5) synthesis, and (6) evaluation. The taxonomy was created to assist both educational researchers and practitioners to understand the fundamental, step-by-step process in which people develop and attain new knowledge and intellectual skills. In other words, the lower classification levels of the taxonomy must be understood and mastered before progressing to the next. Figure 1 presents the taxonomy with definitions and example action verbs for each classification level.

Figure 1 Bloom’s taxonomy of educational learning objectives

Figure

Bloom’s levels define the steps in development of thought, and each level increases in cognitive difficulty. As such, educators often interpret the levels of the taxonomy as climbing a staircase of cognitive complexity, from lower to higher ordered thinking.

Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

In 1995, a former student of Bloom, Lorin W. Anderson, and David R. Krathwohl, a member of the academic team that developed the original Bloom’s taxonomy, assembled and led a team of cognitive psychologists, teacher educators, curriculum specialists, and educational researchers in revising the taxonomy to more accurately represent 21st century teaching and learning. In 2001, Anderson and Krathwohl published their work titled A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Intentionally designed to assist educators in understanding and implementing standards-based curricula, the revised Bloom’s taxonomy presents a two-dimensional model focused on both cognitive and knowledge processes. Figure 2 presents the revised Bloom’s taxonomy in its most frequently depicted table or matrix form and includes the subcategories of levels for both cognitive and knowledge processes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading