Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Attribution Theory

People share a great thirst to understand the causes of situations they encounter and often attempt to explain—to themselves or others—why a specific situation occurred. Attribution theory explains the connection between perceived causes of situations and the psychological consequences of these perceptions. The main idea of the theory is that all causes share three basic, underlying properties: locus, controllability, and stability; these properties determine the psychological consequences of perceived causes. Perceived causes have crucial emotional and behavioral consequences, including those related to the context of achievement motivation.

Much of the existing understanding of the process explained by attribution theory comes from research conducted in the context of school achievement. Individuals’ attempt to understand the causes of their achievement in school often determines their reactions to these causes. This entry further explores the search for these causes and its psychological consequences, then looks at how the causes a person ascribes to events determines his or her psychological reality and how people use attribution theory in their dealings with others or to improve their performance.

Search for Causes of Events and Outcomes

People aspire to understand why different events and outcomes occur. This aspiration is motivated by humans’ innate desire to both understand their environment and to use this understanding to effectively manage their lives. To this end, people often engage in attempts to explain to themselves and to others why an event or outcome came about.

Because the understanding of the reasons for an outcome or event helps people manage their lives, is has important emotional and behavioral consequences. For example, a student who failed an exam may come to the conclusion that this failure was caused by insufficient efforts to study for the exam. In consequence, the student may feel guilty and decide to invest more effort when studying for a future exam. By contrast, if the student thinks that the failure was caused by a lack of ability, this student is likely to feel shame and may decide to quit studies or move to a different field of study. As this example suggests, the cause the student attributes to the outcome determines which emotions are likely to arise and what type of behavior may result from it.

More generally, causal beliefs give rise to emotional reactions and to a variety of inferences, both in the actors who attribute their good or poor performance or situation to various causes and in the involved observers of this performance. Thus, it is not only students who may react to their poor outcome as a function of what they think caused the failure but also, for example, a teacher who also holds a certain belief about what caused this performance. If the teacher thinks that low effort caused the failure, the teacher may react with anger and punish the student. If, on the other hand, the failure is attributed to low ability, then the teacher is more likely to react with pity. This teacher may also infer that the student is lazy or unintelligent, as a function of each respective attribution. Thus, the way people explain events and outcomes determines how they respond to them. This is true for all domains of life, not only for achievements.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading