Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Admissions Tests

Admissions tests usually refer to tests designed to find candidates suitable for higher education. Such tests and other forms of entrance examinations can be made mandatory for applicants in a country or region to take or they may be specific to a university or a university program. This entry first discusses the roles and importance of admissions tests, the principles on which they are based, and their history. It then looks at how admissions tests can be characterized and issues in admissions testing.

In an admission decision, there are two fundamental roles that a test can fulfill: to identify candidates who have sufficient knowledge to be able to complete an education (eligibility) and to rank the candidates and to make a selection in cases where there are more eligible candidates than there are available slots (selection). A test can be designed to meet either of these two roles, although most admissions tests are used only for selection purposes. Admissions tests can be further categorized with respect to the construct or constructs they are assumed to measure. Standardized aptitude tests measure aptitude in general cognitive skills and are designed to determine a person’s ability to learn. Entrance examinations are generally achievement oriented and focus on what a candidate has learned.

Having a fair selection model is of greatest importance in a democratic society. Although modern higher education often can be regarded as education for large parts of the population, universities are still institutions educating those who will hold important positions and influence society. An important question is how the number of slots at these universities should be distributed and what constitutes a fair admissions system, as this is not an easy or uncontroversial question to answer.

Fairness and Meritocracy

Fairness is closely connected to distributive justice, which concerns a socially just allocation of goods. There are several types of distributive norms describing how goods can be allocated such as equity, equality, power, need, and responsibility. In selection to higher education, there are different views on what can be considered a fair system.

Although not uncontroversial, it is common to base admissions systems on the idea of meritocracy. Applicants are ranked by their merits, usually measured by test scores or previous grades. But there may also be influences from a utilitarian approach, where equality, need, and responsibility also become important. Universities may aim for a selection that makes the student body more representative of society as a whole or in some other way more balanced.

There may be practical and ethical problems with following principles other than the meritocratic because it may be regarded as unfair to give certain groups advantages even if they are underrepresented in higher education. Often, it is prohibited to set quotas for certain groups in selection situations, irrespective of whether the group in question is underrepresented. An exception can be when the selection is made between two individuals with equal merits. In order for the meritocratic principle to be maintained, the challenge is therefore to find or develop instruments for eligibility and selection that measure the relevant construct or constructs without any bias related to student background. This has proven to be very difficult, as all measurement instruments, including grades and tests, are known to have error and often work differently for different groups of individuals.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading