Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Adaptive Behavior Assessments

Adaptive behavior refers to a group of basic skills that people must master in order to function and survive. These skills are conceptual, social, and practical skills used in daily life. Assessment of adaptive behavior skills is necessary as a component of the diagnosis or classification for having an intellectual disability.

People with an intellectual disability typically have significant deficits in their conceptual, social, and/or practical skills. These deficits can prevent them from being fully independent. Adaptive behavior measures can be used to help determine the level of impairment. This entry first looks at how the criteria for diagnosing intellectual disabilities have changed and now include deficits in adaptive functioning. It then describes the two main rating scales used to assess adaptive behavior skills, the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales.

Intellectual Disabilities and Adaptive Behavior Skills

A deficit in adaptive behavior skills has not always been a part of assessment for intellectual disabilities. When the American Psychiatric Association first published the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in 1952, the classification category of mental deficiency was introduced to account for cases that were primarily a defect of intelligence present at birth with no known organic brain disease or known prenatal cause for the deficits. Cases were to include only individuals with familial or idiopathic (unknown origin) mental deficiencies, and severity was to be determined by IQ scores in the following three ranges: mild (an IQ of approximately 70–85), moderate (IQ 50–70), and severe (IQs below 50). Although IQ scores were necessary to determine the range and expectations, the DSM noted the importance of considering other factors.

When the second edition of DSM (DSM-II) was first published in 1968, the term mental retardation (MR) replaced mentally deficient. The DSM-II better aligned with what was then called the American Association on Mental Retardation (now the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities) and supported five ranges of severity (borderline, mild, moderate, severe, and profound), with the borderline range for IQ scores in the 68–85 range. It listed clinical codes for 9 subcategories for the disorder, based on the circumstances of origin (e.g., following infection and intoxication; following trauma or physical agent).

In 1980, the DSM-III placed MR in a new section titled “Disorders Usually First Evident in Infancy, Childhood or Adolescence.” The three main criteria for a diagnosis of MR remained consistent with the previous version (i.e., impaired IQ, impaired adaptive behaviors, and onset during the developmental period); however, these criteria were further refined at this time. Subnormal intelligence was now set two standard deviations below the mean (IQ of 70), instead of one standard deviation (IQ of 85) with the addition of a five-point interval to be considered (IQ 65–75) to account for the standard error of measure. Onset during the developmental period was defined as occurring below 18 years of age. Impairments in adaptive functioning were required; however, the DSM noted that the then-current measures were not considered valid to be used in isolation to make this decision and recommended that clinical judgment should evaluate adaptive functioning in individuals relative to similar aged peers.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading