Entry
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Virtual Interview
A virtual interview is any form of interview that uses information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as email, discussion board, and real-time chat. It is a specific form of virtual research that enables researchers to use the immediacy of the internet to access participants and gather data for qualitative research investigations. Virtual communication has become one of the main forms of human engagement and is used in the transmission and exchange of ideas, experience, and attitudes. It follows that ICTs provide unique and inventive opportunities for qualitative researchers.
The types of virtual interviews include structured unstructured, and semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews, focus groups, and group interviews. Each follows the same logic in terms of suitability of method for types of data collected. For example, structured interviews can be used for large data collection on attitudes; focus group interviews for an in-depth understanding of attitudes, perceptions, and opinions as well as for evaluation purposes; and in-depth interviews for accessing experiential data. To this extent, each technique can be targeted and directed at specific individuals or interest groups, or it can be circulated more broadly to assess attitudinal responses.
One-on-one real-time virtual interviews provide focused and spontaneous responses, as do synchronous virtual focus group interviews. The former aim to closely replicate the discursive nature of face-to-face interviews, whereas the latter can be “fast and furious” so that threads may be difficult to follow with multiple participants responding simultaneously, thereby disrupting the sequential nature of interaction. Asynchronous responses, on the other hand, provide participants with the opportunity to reflect on their own responses and those of others. This enables participants to monitor what information they are prepared to share, and this is ethically important when discussing sensitive issues. In the virtual setting, participants have a choice of responding to a question or withholding a response, thereby providing a noncoercive discursive environment. With asynchronous virtual interviews, the ongoing discussion is structured by specific questions during a set period of time (usually several days to a week).
One main difference between face-to-face and virtual interviews is the somewhat changed role of the interviewer or moderator. The interviewer must construct the environment for discussion and explicitly set the rules of engagement prior to the interview because the interviewer's role is less interventionist and less directive than in conventional interviews. Virtual listening cues, the insertion of probes, and additional questions need to be developed both to enhance the steering role of the interviewer and to replace visual nonverbal cues, such as nods and facial expressions, of the face-to-face interviewer.
Research Studies Using Virtual Focus Groups
Virtual methods can be considered when designing studies that involve groups or individuals who are, for whatever reason, hesitant or unable to participate in face-to-face interviews. In two separate studies, researchers used virtual focus groups (alongside face-to-face groups) in studies of public attitudes to new biotechnologies. They wanted to include participants who had a stake or special interest in either DNA paternity testing or stem cell research; the participants' opinions were integral to the studies. Accordingly, for the paternity testing study, a group of fathers' rights leaders, who advocate unrestricted and direct access to paternity testing, was interviewed online. Men who were involved in fathers' rights groups were generally unprepared to speak to outsiders but actively participated in a virtual group, providing an in-depth understanding of their attitudes, as well as their constituents' attitudes, toward paternity testing. The second paternity testing group was mothers whose estranged partners had denied paternity. The mothers and their children were compelled to undergo testing to have the fathers' names on their children's birth certificates and/or to meet the requirements for claiming child support payments. All of the women were single mothers with responsibilities for young babies that affected their ability to participate in a face-to-face focus group. For the stem cell research project, the two interest groups involved were those with a particular interest in, or stance on, stem cell research. The first consisted of a religious group with strongly held views on abortion; the second was a patient group whose members had a medical condition that might be helped or cured by stem cell research. The latter group was interviewed only online. This patient group was people living with either Parkinson's disease or spinal injury who were young enough to personally benefit from any promising developments in the near future. Their restricted mobility, medication, and need for care rendered it nearly impossible to meet in a face-to-face setting. Anonymity and virtual engagement were enhanced in each group by the absence of physical cues and the use of anonymizing techniques afforded by the technology itself. Virtual identities enabled participants to find commonality beyond the usual social and physical barriers to communication such as socioeconomic status, gender, age, ethnicity, and (importantly) disability status. Overall, the researchers found that virtual interviews fostered democratic participation in research, enabling inclusion of groups whose members' pertinent views otherwise may have been overlooked.
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches