Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Personal projects are extended sets of personally relevant action with important implications for human well-being and adaptation. Personal projects analysis (PPA) is a methodology that allows researchers and practitioners to assess the content, appraisal, hierarchical nature, and impact of personal projects. Developed by Brian R. Little in the late 1970s, PPA has been widely adopted as the standard for assessing personal action and goal constructs in diverse fields of study. It is not a test, but an integrated set of flexible assessment modules. PPA is based upon a set of 12 foundational criteria that are prescribed as important to meet before orthodox psychometric criteria such as reliability and validity are addressed. Eight of these are discussed here as being particularly relevant to quantitative assessment methodology.

By way of brief overview, PPA provides a set of modules for (a) eliciting an individual's personal projects, (b) appraising these projects on a set of dimensions that has been selected for both theoretical relevance and applied utility, and (c) assessing additional features of project systems such as their hierarchical structure and impact. We will first discuss the foundational assumptions of the methodology, then describe two of the modules, and conclude with brief comments on the significance of the methodology for contemporary basic and applied research.

Eight Foundational Criteria for PPA

Personal Saliency

The personal saliency criterion requires that the units be personally significant to the individual being assessed and that these units be expressed in their own idiosyncratic language. In contrast with standard inventories, PPA does not supply instances of the unit of analysis, but elicits them. The personal saliency criterion ensures that individuals can generate examples of the plans and actions they deem important to know if we are to understand their lives.

Ecological Representativeness

Projects are not just personal constructions, they are contextually embedded actions. This criterion requires that an assessment procedure afford an understanding of the person's everyday social ecology. Whereas the personal saliency criterion highlights the subjective importance of personal projects, this criterion illuminates the contextual factors that frustrate or facilitate project pursuit.

Social Indicator Potential

Besides providing information relevant to individuals, we believe that assessment can also provide information relevant to the social ecologies (e.g., workplace, rural area) within which individuals carry out their projects. In short, data derived from PPA have the potential to contribute to the development of social indicators—such as which projects are difficult for elderly people living in rural areas, or which are most enjoyable for inner-city youth. This criterion ensures that the data we gather on individuals and their pursuits are relevant to policy makers who design the contexts within which these pursuits take place.

Temporal Extension

Many assessment devices use units that take “snapshots” of human characteristics; PPA allows the temporally extended nature of daily lives to come into focus. Personal projects typically proceed through stages of inception, planning, action, and termination, although there are individual differences in the extent to which these stages are negotiated. Although much of the research on personal projects is cross-sectional, there is increasing use of longitudinal designs using hierarchical analysis in which we can examine projects embedded within persons, who in turn are embedded in different ecologies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading