Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

According to Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary, invariant simply means “constant,” and, in mathematics more specifically, “a quantity or expression that is constant throughout a certain range of conditions” (p. 1003). Furthermore, a parameter in a statistical model is an explicit component of a mathematical model that has a value in one or multiple populations of interest; its value is estimated with a certain estimation routine based on sample data to calibrate the model. Therefore, parameter invariance simply means that a certain parameter in a certain statistical model is constant across different measurement conditions such as examinee subgroups, time points, or contexts.

From a decision-making viewpoint, parameter invariance is a desirable characteristic of a statistical model, because it implies that identical statistical decisions can be made across different measurement conditions. In this sense, parameter invariance is one of the preconditions for the generalizability of inferences.

Four aspects of parameter invariance warrant a separate highlighting because they are easily overlooked by practitioners. First, parameter invariance is an abstract ideal state, because parameters are either invariant or not. If a parameter varies across measurement conditions, then a lack of invariance is present, which is a continuum of differing values. However, it is always open to debate and secondary assessment whether the difference between parameter values across conditions affects practical decision making. Second, parameter invariance is always tied to a specific statistical model that contains parameters as elements. Therefore, the issue of whether parameters are invariant cannot be answered abstractly without reference to a certain statistical model. Third, parameter invariance implies a comparison of parameter values across measurement conditions, making discussions about invariance without a reference frame for what constitutes different conditions similarly irrelevant.

The Mathematical Formalization of Parameter Invariance

In the psychometric literature, particularly in the area of confirmatory factor analysis, parameter invariance has had a long tradition, and important groundwork was laid in the middle of the previous century. In the early 1990s, when models in Item Response Theory (IRT) became more popular and accessible, the work of Meredith and colleagues expanded the rich basis of work by Jöreskog and McDonald. At the end of the 1990s, procedures for assessing parameter invariance had become fully integrated into many software programs for latent variable models, such as BILOG-MG, Mplus, LISREL, or AMOS.

Today, parameter invariance has also become fully conceptually integrated into comprehensive and unifying treatments of modeling frameworks in the area of psychometrics and, sometimes, does not appear to have any particular importance for authors that merits a treatment in separate chapters or even books.

Methodological Approaches for Assessing Parameter Invariance

The following common approaches are organized by the type of comparison that is being done (i.e., across subgroups of items, persons, or time points). Moreover, this entry will focus on parameter invariance for psychometric assessment as it is investigated with both observed- and latent-variable models. Although the issue of what constitutes a latent variable is complex itself, for the purpose of this entry, latent variable models are defined as statistical models that contain continuous or discrete unobservable variables whose values are estimated with a specific algorithm.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading