Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Hello-Goodbye Effect refers to the bias caused by patients who exaggerate their problems before a treatment (or any intervention), hoping to be eligible for the therapy, and minimize their problems at the end of the treatment, hoping to please the therapist. The Effect has two components. The first is related to the Faking Bad Bias, whereby participants try to appear sick to qualify for support. The second is related to the Faking Good Bias (or Social Desirability Bias or Obsequiousness Bias), whereby participants may systematically respond in the direction they perceive to be desired by the investigator.

An example of the Hello-Goodbye Effect is found in a review of pain measures of patients before and after acupuncture treatment. Pain is the most frequent complaint of patients referred for acupuncture. However, it is difficult to measure because it cannot be measured directly and must be measured on the basis of the patients' response. For example, the patient may be asked to select from five pain categories ranging from none to intense or from a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10. Results of the measurement can be greatly influenced by the individual's genotype, culture, conditioning, education, and so on. The review suggested that, when patients first present for treatment, they need to justify their request for help, so there is a subconscious tendency to exaggerate symptoms. After patients have received treatment, they may want to please the therapist, or at least not hurt the therapist's feelings, so there is a tendency to minimize symptoms.

The Hello-Goodbye Effect may result in surprising improvements in the symptoms after a treatment. In extreme cases, even totally ineffective treatments can produce an improvement in treatment results.

In clinical practice, it is difficult to prevent or minimize the Hello-Goodbye Effect. But in research, it can be minimized by letting participants know that the information they provide (as recorded on the forms or questionnaires) will not be seen by the therapist.

One must be careful not to confuse the Hello-Goodbye Effect with other, distinctly different effects, which in some cases may produce similar outcomes. These effects may include Apprehension Bias (certain measures may alter systematically from their usual levels when the participant is apprehensive; e.g., blood pressure may change during medical interviews); Attention Bias (or the Hawthorne Effect; study participants may systematically alter their behavior when they know they are being observed); Culture Bias (participants' responses may differ because of culture differences); and the placebo effect (measurable, observable, or felt improvement in health attributable not to treatment but to a placebo, which is a medication or treatment believed by the therapist to be inert or innocuous).

Applying Ideas on Statistics and Measurement

The following abstract is adapted from Walters, G. D., Trgovac, M., Rychlec, M., Di Fazio, R., & Olson, J. R. (2002). Assessing change with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: A controlled analysis and multisite cross-validation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(3), 308–331.

Lee Cronbach, a famous measurement specialist, coined the term Hello-Goodbye Effect to explain how participants in programs create an overly positive image of the effects of a program when exiting that program. In this study, the sensitivity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) to psychotherapeutically assisted change was evaluated in a series of three studies. In the first study, a repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant group (participant-waiting list) and time (pretest-posttest) effects, and a paired t test indicated significant reductionson the PICTS Current CriminalThinking scale in group participants. In the second study, inmates from four different settings who were participating in programs of differing length and content achieved statistically significant temporal reductions on the Current and Historical Criminal Thinking scales. Results from the third study showed that significant pretest-posttest reductions on the Current Criminal Thinking scale were specific to good-prognosis participants. There is also some reason to believe that the Hello-Goodbye Effect may have had a stronger impact on those who participated in the shorter group.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading