Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Objectives-based evaluation refers to a class of evaluation approaches that centers on the specification of objectives and the measurement of outcomes. Specifically, objectives-based evaluation (sometimes referred to as objectives-oriented or objectivesreferenced evaluation) focuses on generating information for accountability and decision making by developing and measuring the appropriate objectives for these purposes.

Ralph Tyler, often noted as the father of educational evaluation, has been credited with being a principal proponent of objectives-based evaluation approaches. Tyler, in his seminal 1942 manuscript General Statement on Evaluation, states that objectivesbased evaluation entails (a) formulating a statement of educational objectives, (b) classifying these objectives into major types, (c) defining and refining each of these types of objectives in terms of behavior, (d) identifying situations in which students can be expected to display these types of behaviors, (e) selecting and trying promising methods for obtaining evidence regarding each type of objective, (f) selecting on the basis of preliminary trials the more promising appraisal methods for further development and improvement, and (g) devising means for interpreting and using the results. This approach of linking program objectives to outcome measures organized the tasks and goals of educational evaluation in a framework that was the dominant paradigm for almost half a century.

Tyler's influential work on the Eight Year Study, a longitudinal study of progressive education through the 4 years of secondary school and the 4 years of college, was the first large-scale evaluation to be designed using such an approach. This study, for a number of reasons (only one of which is the evaluation approach), has been noted as one of the most significant evaluations of the 20th century. Indeed, Madaus and Stufflebeam, in their 1989 book Educational Evaluation: Classic Works of Ralph W. Tyler, state, “Tyler's work on the Eight Year Study is still the best available description of how evaluators can work cooperatively with teachers to clarify instructional objectives and develop indicators of students' continuous progress toward the mastery of a whole range of learning outcomes” (p. xii).

POST-TYLER OBJECTIVES-BASED MODELS

Objectives-oriented evaluation had a strong influence on educational evaluation for many decades and, as part of that influence, several notable objectives-based theoretical models were developed, particularly during the 1960s and 1970s. These objectives-based models focus on behavioral objectives, performance objectives, and measurable objectives—which were all, more or less, synonymous terms for a specific objective that described exactly what was expected of students after instruction. These explicit objectives were distinguished from the more nebulous educational goals and objectives educators had been previously admonished for articulating. With more precise, unambiguous objectives, it was argued that one could determine with more confidence when they had been met.

In 1962, Robert Mager published a primer on how to write instructional objectives. The primer had a large impact on those interested in objectives-based evaluation models. Mager's approach to developing instructional objectives was central to many objectives-based evaluation models, and it played a particularly pivotal role in the work of W. James Popham.

Popham, following the Tyler model, developed and promoted a popular objectives-based evaluation approach that focused primarily on the championing of behavioral objective specification. Popham's evaluation model relied heavily on measuring educational outcomes, and as such, de-emphasized the focus on the instructional process. In his text The Uses of Instructional Objectives: A Personal Perspective (1973), Popham wrote, “The single most important deficiency in American education is its preoccupation with instructional process. This overriding concern with procedures rather than results produced by those procedures manifests itself in myriad ways. Teachers design classroom instructional sequences by asking, ‘What shall I do?’ rather than the appropriate question, which is ‘What do I wish my learners to become?’” (p. 53).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading