Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The notion of systems psychodynamics refers to social, psychological and political forces that underpin human behaviour in social systems of all kinds. Almost by definition, the people involved in such dynamics either lack awareness of the degree to which these forces influence them or interpret what they are aware of in a way that serves their self-interests. Action research has proven a pivotal methodology necessary for understanding and changing the dynamics in a social system—be it a family, group, organization or community, or a bigger and more complex situation.

Through using action research, scholarly practitioners can observe, explain and interpret the social, psychological and political forces that are helping the social system in (or hindering it from) being effective during normal operation or in making the changes needed for survival and growth. Bringing such dynamics to awareness for explicit discussion and debate can contribute to working through difficulties and recognizing strengths. This entry summarizes this type of action research, using six dimensions linked historically to the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (TIHR), the research and development organization in London, UK, often given credit for its original formation and early application to workplaces.

Framing the Change Situation

Action research from a perspective of systems psychodynamics tends to start with concerns about organizational culture and persisting difficulties in working well together. Commissioners of such action research may speak to unhelpful attitudes or poor motivation within a section of the social system or, indeed, across two or more parts of a larger organization. Often, leaders link strategic challenges currently under way or anticipated with an out-of-date historical or societal element in employee behaviour. Education, social services, health care, religious organizations and government systems illustrate sectors in which this framing of change originated.

Role of Consultant and Stakeholder in a Typical Change Approach

Scholarly practitioners working predominately from a systems psychodynamic perspective use developmental interventions that create meetings and workshops for people to work through difficult thoughts and feelings about relevant aspects of a challenging change. The role of the consultant tends to emphasize observation, analysis and interpretation. Of particular concern are types of social defences people enact as they avoid anxieties. Those people with a stake in the change process usually take responsibility for making conclusions, planning actions and otherwise identifying outcomes from the process of working through. This type of action research often works well alongside other, more familiar types of change management.

Nature of Intervention and Character of Participation

A central orientation of intervention from a systems psychodynamic perspective can be understood to be process consultation. Many types of intervention can be used: individual coaching or counselling, third party consultation, small groups, inter-groups, medium or large groups. In order to work with the emerging data, scholarly practitioners need to be in a participant observation role. This allows them to discover and then share verbally tentative hypotheses with the people in the room. Alternately, working notes can be written and circulated for a wider population to study. Generally, the consultant retains a specialist role while encouraging employees to increase their competency in sense making and in taking up roles to improve their situation.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading