Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The notion of socio-technical systems (STSs) refers to the necessity of taking both social factors and technological factors into consideration in designing and implementing humane work organizations. This approach to systems design grew from European concerns about scientific management after World War II and spread widely around the world in the 1980s with joint management and trade union co-operation under the label of Quality of Working Life. Action research is an essential methodology for redesigning work as different sectors, technologies and employee characteristics require a customized approach. Further, the amount of time and labour involved in STSs means that the dynamics unique to a particular organization have to be worked through and managed as part of the change process.

By using action research, scholarly practitioners can combine linear planning and problem-solving methodologies with longitudinal observation, analysis and interpretation, made possible by being in the workplace up close and over time. Multiple streams of linear project management for changes coexist with aspects of organization wherein social and technical issues evolve in less linear ways and at less predictable paces. This entry summarizes this type of action research, using six dimensions linked historically to the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, the research and development organization in London, UK, often given credit for its original formation and early experimentation in workplaces.

Framing the Change Situation

Action research from the perspective of STSs tends to start with plans to introduce a new technology, different work procedures, new products and other aspects of operating a business or providing services. Such strategies require co-operation from employees for alteration in assignments, training, terms and conditions and occupational differentials. Such changes almost always have to do with the organization's regulatory or competitive environment more widely and need to involve bargaining with employee representatives. Industry, commerce, shipping and energy are the sectors in which this framing of change originated.

Role of Consultant and Stakeholder in a Typical Change Approach

Scholarly practitioners involved with an STS analysis use design interventions that help people study their own work processes and identify improvements in how the people and technology relate across and between flows of work. The role of the consultant tends to include expertise in elements of diagnosis, analysis and recommendations for particular work organization redesign. By definition, an STS approach includes those with a stake in the outcome in problem-solving and decision-making groups of various sizes and interconnectedness.

Nature of Intervention and Character of Participation

A central orientation of intervention from an STS perspective can be the work organization design. A few, well-established approaches to intervention tend to be used, sometimes in co-operation with other change management techniques and goals. A long-term infrastructure tends to use organization-wide steering teams, specific design teams for subunits or a series of temporary project teams to design and deliver elements of the change. Alternately, large-group interventions focus on bringing people together in order to design and deliver work restructuring. Participation is of particular importance for STS action research: People who will be working in the new work system must participate, thus building capability to manage STS change through training of internal people and including their views throughout.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading