Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Social accountability can be defined as an approach in which citizens or civil society organizations hold public institutions (institutions established by law and statute and funded by public money) accountable. It is an ongoing and collective effort by citizens or civil society organizations which bridges the gap of electoral accountability. Through social accountability, public institutions instead of being indirectly accountable to citizens (via independent government bodies or a special wing of a government department, e.g. Vigilance) become directly accountable to citizens.

Citizens, civil society organizations and sometimes universities collaboratively take up social accountability, which involves data gathering about the performance of the government from the community and government departments. Social accountability can be considered a form of action research as it raises awareness about poor accountability in a political system amongst the above-mentioned stakeholders and encourages critical reflection that can lead to solutions. The collaborative learning also creates opportunities for further innovations in social accountability and its replication in other regions.

At the outset, it is important to understand the rationale for choosing social accountability as a means to promote accountability in different political contexts. The history of social accountability explains that the shift to social accountability was not sudden; it has taken quite long for social accountability to establish itself as a credible instrument of accountability. Different types of social accountability mechanisms across the world are described in the next section. The section on enablers of social accountability describes the basic factors that make social accountability successful in a particular social context. The expectations from social accountability are then discussed, as well as the constraints of social accountability.

Searching for Citizen-Centred Accountability Mechanisms

Existing accountability mechanisms including electoral accountability do not give space for the participation of citizens in accountability as government-established bodies are the main instruments of ensuring accountability. In such cases, citizens are mute witnesses to a huge web of accountability procedures, and the only means of intervention is to approach elected members of parliament or attend the consultations convened by government bodies. This route to accountability is long and leaves little room for the articulation of citizens' opinions. As a result, basic services to citizens are delayed, and there are opportunities for siphoning off government funds. These constraints to citizen engagement have led to a search for a shorter route for citizens to directly engage with public institutions. Social accountability is one of the shorter routes which allow citizens to engage directly with public institutions to ensure accountability.

Types of Social Accountability

Social accountability can be divided into four stages based on the public finance expenditure cycle. The examples in the four stages have been taken from Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, India and the Philippines.

  • Planning: Public policymaking and participatory planning
  • Budgeting: Independent budget analysis and advocacy, analysis of budget for local bodies, gender-responsive budget and participatory budget
  • Expenditure: Public expenditure tracking and social audit
  • Performance: Participatory performance monitoring, community monitoring, Citizen Report Cards on health and water, citizen charter, right to information and public hearing

These social accountability mechanisms have improved the delivery of basic services such as employment, food subsidy and education to children and checked corruption. For example, through Government Watch Social Accountability in the schools of Naga City, Philippines, the quality of school education has improved; participatory budgets in some municipalities in Brazil have resulted in the prioritization of budgets by citizen needs and social audits of the Employment Guarantee Scheme in India have checked corruption and provided employment to the poor. The changing pattern of engagement between citizens and public institutions has gained prominence in recent times, but it has roots going back to the 1980s and 1990s, when tools such as participatory budgets were tried out in Latin America.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading