Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Critical pedagogy is a cross-disciplinary field that recognizes education as an essentially political practice that should be utilized to advance democratic ideals and to end oppression. Specifically, critical pedagogues look at how education itself can be an oppressive force and how outside oppressive forces, such as neo-liberalism, shape the purpose and function of education. Critical pedagogy supports the empowerment of culturally marginalized and economically disenfranchised students and calls upon teachers to recognize how schools have historically embraced theories and practices that serve to unite knowledge and power in ways that sustain asymmetrical relationships of power and maintain the status quo. Critical pedagogy recognizes that all knowledge is created within a historical context, that all decisions about pedagogy and education are inherently political decisions and that schools can actually work against the interests of those students who are most politically and economically vulnerable within society. This entry will address the development of critical pedagogy as a branch of knowledge, introduce a number of key concepts used in discussions of the field, review the major intellectual influences on scholars working in this area and finally consider some of the challenges to critical pedagogy and how they might be addressed.

Development and Details

While Henry Giroux is generally credited with first using the term critical pedagogy, the work of Paulo Freire has had, inarguably, the greatest influence on this body of scholarship. Freire was a Brazilian educator best known for providing literacy education to peasants. His first, and most influential, book, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, first published in Portuguese in 1968, was written after a 15-year exile following his arrest for his work in education. This book was a response to the poor living conditions he found in the cities and countryside of his home country and challenged readers to consider the danger of oppressive elements in society and education. He focused specifically on the problem of what he called the banking model, a commonly used pedagogical model in which teachers make ‘deposits' of what they consider to be true knowledge into the minds of students, which are assumed to be empty or without valuable knowledge of their own. Freire argued that the problem with the banking model is that it indoctrinates students to accept what the powerful class accepts to be true or valuable. Instead, students should be taught to be critical thinkers so that they can fully participate in democracy and become their own liberators. This critical thinking and liberation can be achieved, in Freire's view, only through the process of conscientização (or ‘conscientization’ in English), which encourages students to become deeply, socially aware and empowered through acknowledging the social, economic and political realities that affect their lives. The end goal of conscientização is for students to realize that they have the power to change their own realities. Freire posited that conscientização can only be reached through dialogue, an educational strategy that requires humility and the exchange of ideas. The influence of his work on the work of the critical pedagogues who followed him cannot be overstated.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading