Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Critical Participatory Action Research
Participants in Critical Participatory Action Research (CPAR) study their own individual and collective social practices to identify how these practices may be irrational, unsustainable or unjust for those involved in and affected by them. If participants discover untoward social practices or consequences, they work to avoid or overcome what is untoward about them. To conduct CPAR, the participants in a social practice reflect individually and collectively on their own practice with the aim of changing (a) what they think and say in their current practice (sayings), (2) what they do in the practice (doings) and (3) how they relate to the other people and things they interact with in the practice (relatings). Participants conduct collective critique of the conditions and traditions that prefigure the current forms of sayings, doings and relatings of their practices, with a view to understanding how they constrain or enable new ways of acting, individually and collectively. CPAR is a practice-changing practice: It is a social practice deliberately directed at changing other social practices.
CPAR is practised in diverse fields, for example, the women's movement, indigenous land rights, green and conservation activism, disease prevention and professional fields such as education, nursing, medicine and agriculture.
Critical Communities in CPAR
CPAR involves commitments which only participants themselves can enact in practice. CPAR as an approach creates the conditions for practitioners to do the following:
- Understand and develop the ways in which practices are conducted ‘from within’ the practice traditions that inform and orient them
- Speak the language, use the interpretive categories and join the conversations and critical debates of those whose action constitutes practice
- Participate in and develop the forms of action and kinds of interaction in which the practice is conducted
- Participate in and develop communities of practice through which the practice is conducted, both in the relationships between different participants in a particular site or setting of practice and (in the case of a professional practice) in the relationships between people who are collectively responsible for the practice (whether as members of a professional body or as researchers into the practice)
- Contribute to the individual and collective transformation of the conduct and consequences of the practice to meet the needs of changing times and circumstances by confronting and overcoming what the participants themselves regard as
- irrational, incoherent or contradictory in their understandings of a practice;
- unsustainable, unproductive or unsatisfying in the activities and work of the practice and
- unjust or harmful in the relationships among the people and groups involved in and affected by the practice
Participants in CPAR create critical communities to focus attention on legitimate concerns about their individual and collective work and lives, agreeing to work together to understand their work and lives more clearly, to act and work more constructively and to relate to one another and the world more sustainably. They form groups and networks that are ‘public spheres' (inside and outside institutions) in which people participate (e.g. as speakers, as listeners, as observers or by absenting themselves) voluntarily, aiming to establish a critical distance from the formal structures of institutions and interest groups, in order to study problems and issues that arise in their work and lives and the conditions that shape their work and lives. In these public spheres, participants collectively aim to assist one another to establish the intersubjective validity and legitimacy of their sayings, doings and relatings in their efforts to overcome whatever is irrational, unsustainable or unjust in the conduct or consequences of their practices. Participants in critical communities in CPAR decide together what they will explore (research) and what they will change (action). They understand their communal work and lives as socially constructed through people's actions in history that can be socially reconstructed, when needed, by people acting together, wisely and prudently, to construct new histories.
...
- Alinsky, Saul
- Argyris, Chris
- Bateson, Gregory
- Boal, Augusto
- Chataway, Cynthia Joy
- Dewey, John
- Emery, Fred
- Fals Borda, Orlando
- Freire, Paulo
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg
- Horton, Myles
- Kincheloe, Joe
- Lewin, Kurt
- marino, dian
- Martín-Baró, Ignacio
- Nielsen, Kurt Aagaard
- Noffke, Susan
- Schön, Donald
- Toulmin, Stephen
- Whyte, William Foote
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig
- Academic Discourse
- Agency
- Appreciative Intelligence
- Authenticity
- Bakhtinian Dialogism
- Bildung
- Community of Inquiry
- Communities of Practice
- Conscientization
- Critical Friend
- Critical Reference Group
- Dialogue
- Double-Loop Learning
- Empowerment
- Engaged Scholarship
- Hegemony
- Heteroglossia
- Heutagogy
- Identity
- Knowledge Democracy
- Metaphor
- Non-Indigenous Ally
- Organizational Culture
- Positionality
- Subalternity
- Sustainability
- Systems Thinking
- Tacit Knowledge
- Taylorism
- Technical Action Research
- Tempered Radical
- Transformative Learning
- Vivencia
- Voice
- Epistemology
- Experiential Knowing
- Experiential Learning
- Extended Epistemology
- Hawaiian Epistemology
- Māori Epistemology
- Practical Knowing
- Ubuntu
- Covenantal Ethics
- Ethics and Moral Decision-Making
- Feminist Ethics
- Indigenous Research Ethics and Practice
- Institutional Review Board
- Capacity Building
- Citizen Participation
- Co-Generative Learning
- Environmental Justice
- Knowledge Mobilization
- Local Self-Governance
- Social Accountability
- Social Justice
- Women's Political Empowerment
- Action Evaluation
- Advocacy and Inquiry
- Autobiography
- Bricolage Process
- Case Study
- Citizen Report Card
- Citizens' Juries
- Cognitive Mapping
- Collaborative Data Analysis
- Community Dialogue
- Community Mapping
- Computer-Based Instruction
- Concept Mapping
- Conflict Management
- Convergent Interviewing
- Critical Reflection
- Democratic Dialogue
- Descriptive Review
- Development Coalitions
- Dialogue Conferences
- Digital Storytelling
- Discourse Analysis
- Fishbone Diagram
- Focus Groups
- Interviews
- Journaling
- Listening Guide
- Microplanning
- Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue
- Narrative Inquiry
- Organizational Storytelling
- Participatory Monitoring
- Photovoice
- Research Circles
- Search Conference
- Social Audit
- Stakeholder Analysis
- Storytelling
- World Café, The
- Action Learning
- Action Science
- Anti-Oppression Research
- Appreciative Inquiry and Research Methodology
- Appreciative Inquiry and Sustainable Value Creation
- Arts-Based Action Research
- Asset-Based Community Development
- Citizen Science
- Classroom-Based Action Research
- Clinical Inquiry
- Collaborative Action Research
- Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry
- Collaborative Management Research
- Community-Based Participatory Research
- Community-Based Research
- Comprehensive District Planning
- Co-Operative Inquiry
- Critical Action Learning
- Critical Participatory Action Research
- Critical Utopian Action Research
- Dialogic Inquiry
- Ethnography
- Evaluative Inquiry
- Feminist Participatory Action Research
- First Person Action Research
- Grounded Theory
- Indigenist Research
- Indigenous Research Methods
- Interactive Research
- Intervention Research in Management
- Large-Group Action Research
- Learning History
- Living Life as Inquiry
- Narrative
- Oral History
- Participatory Action Research
- Participatory Design Programming
- Participatory Governance
- Participatory Learning and Action
- Participatory Rapid Appraisal
- Participatory Rural Appraisal
- Participatory Theatre
- Participatory Urban Planning
- Performed Ethnography
- Practice Development
- Practitioner Inquiry
- Pragmatic Action Research
- Process Consultation
- Qualimetrics Intervention Research
- Quantitative Methods
- Reflective Practice
- Second Person Action Research
- Soft Systems Methodology
- Strategic Planning
- Strengths-Based Approach
- Systemic Action Research
- Systems Psychodynamics
- Theatre of the Oppressed
- Third Person Action Research
- Transpersonal Inquiry
- Work-Based Learning
- Youth Participatory Action Research
- Cycles of Action and Reflection
- Data Analysis
- Disseminating Action Research
- Gender Issues
- Generalizability
- Information and Communications Technology and Organizational Change
- Integrating Grounded Theory
- Intersubjectivity
- Meta-Methodology
- Mode 1 and Mode 2 Knowledge Production
- Quality
- Reliability
- Rigour
- Transferability
- Validity
- Antigonish Movement
- Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice
- Collaborative Action Research Network
- Community Design Centres
- Community-University Partnership Programme
- Community-Campus Partnerships for Health
- Community-University Research Partnerships
- Cornell Participatory Action Research Network
- Dig Where You Stand Movement
- Disabled People's Organizations
- Global Alliance for Community-Engaged Research
- Gonogobeshona
- Grameen Bank
- Highlander Research and Education Center
- Institute of Development Studies
- International Council for Adult Education
- International Participatory Research Network
- Jipemoyo Project
- LGBT
- Maya Women of Chajul
- Mondragón Co-Operatives
- Norwegian Industrial Democracy Movement
- Office of Community-Based Research
- Research Initiatives, Bangladesh
- Social Movement Learning Movement
- Society for Participatory Research in Asia
- Tavistock Institute
- Work Research Institute, The
- World Congresses of Action Research
- Action Turn, The
- Aesthetics
- Communitarianism
- Critical Constructivism
- Critical Pedagogy
- Critical Race Theory
- Critical Realism
- Frankfurt School
- Hermeneutics
- Ontology
- Phenomenology
- Philosophy of Science
- Phrónêsis
- Positive Organizational Scholarship and Appreciative Inquiry
- Praxeology
- Praxis
- Téchnê
- Action Anthropology
- Adult Education
- Agriculture and Ecological Integrity
- Community Development
- Criminal Justice Systems
- Design Research
- Development Action Research
- Educational Action Research
- Environment and Climate Change
- Evaluation
- Health Care
- Health Education
- Health Promotion
- Higher Education
- HIV Prevention and Support
- Human Rights
- Information Systems
- Insider Action Research
- Inter-Organizational Action Research
- Labour-Managed Firms
- New Product Development
- Nursing
- Operations Management
- Organization Development
- Participatory Disaster Management
- Project Management
- Regional Development
- Subaltern Studies
- Voluntary Sector
- Workers' Participation in Occupational Health and Safety
- Work-Family Interventions
- Dissertation Writing
- Facilitation
- Supervising Action Research Theses and Dissertations
- Teaching Action Researchers
- Christian Spirituality of Action
- Confucian Principles
- Islamic Practice
- Jewish Belief, Thought and Practice
- Karma Theory
- Liberation Theology
- Mindful Inquiry
- Theological Action Research
- Activity Theory
- Complexity Theory
- Constructivism
- Feminism
- Field Theory
- Humanism
- Liberation Psychology
- Living Theories
- Marxism
- Post-Colonial Theory
- Postmodernism
- Pragmatism
- Relational-Cultural Theory
- Social Constructionism
- Social Learning
- Socio-Technical Systems
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Theories of Action
- Asset Mapping
- Force Field Analysis
- Geographic Information Systems
- Ladder of Inference
- Ladder of Participation
- Learning Pathways Grid
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches