Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

During the past decade, various sequential design methods in clinical trial designs have been developed to allow for interim decisions and trial modifications based on cumulated information. As part of well-known adaptive designs in group sequential analysis, Yu Shen and Lloyd Fisher proposed a sequential strategy for monitoring clinical trials, namely self-designing trials. The final test statistic is a weighted average of the sufficient statistic from each stage, where the weight for each stage is determined by the observed data prior to that stage. One important feature of this self-designing trial is that the maximum sample size or the maximum number of interim analyses, m, is not specified in advance but at a random stopping time. The flexibility of modifying the sample size allows one to save an underpowered study when unexpected events occur.

Preliminaries of a Self-Designing Trial

Consider an equally randomized clinical trial to compare a treatment, T, and a control, C. Assume that the difference between the two arms is normally distributed with an unknown mean θ and known variance σ2. The methodology can be extended to the situation with unknown variance. Positive values of θ imply superiority of the treatment T. Suppose the block size at each stage to be {2Bi, i = 1, 2, …}, where Bi for each arm is pre-fixed. Let denote the mean difference for the ith block of data. i ∼ N(θ, σ2/Bi).

Let Si define the standardized statistic based on the ith block of data and Uj define the standardized statistic for the cumulated data up to the jth analysis; then

The one-sided null hypothesis, H0: θ ≤ 0, is tested against the alternative hypothesis H1: θ > 0.

The trial is reviewed after observing every 2Bi subjects at the ith interim analysis. If the cumulated information shows sufficient evidence that the new treatment is ineffective or inferior to the standard one, the trial should be terminated early. At each interim analysis, the futility boundary is constructed from the confidence limit of θ specified at significance level α0 and the expected mean difference δ. If Uj is below the futility boundary, the trial is terminated to accept H0 at the next step. Otherwise, a weight based on the conditional power is calculated using the cumulated data before the current step. The procedure is iterated until the total squared weight reaches one at step m, that is, and . Specifically, after observing the jth block of data,

The weight functions are constructed using conditional power except at the first step. Specifically, w1 = (B1/N1)1/2, where N1 = (zα + zβ)2σ22, and α and β are the specified Type I and II error rates, respectively. Note that α0 is the significance level used for futility monitoring that can be different from a. For j > 2,

is the naive estimator of θ using the cumulated data up to the jth block, and Nj is solved from an inequality aimed at achieving conditional power of 1–β. The final test statistic is constructed as a weighted average of the sufficient statistic of each

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading