Summary
Contents
Subject index
This handbook is a much-needed and in-depth review of the distinctive set of ethical considerations which accompanies qualitative research. This is particularly crucial given the emergent, dynamic and interactional nature of most qualitative research, which too often allows little time for reflection on the important ethical responsibilities and obligations Contributions from leading international researchers have been carefully organised into six key thematic sections: Part One: Thick Descriptions Of Qualitative Research Ethics Part Two: Qualitative Research Ethics By Technique Part Three: Ethics As Politics Part Four: Qualitative Research Ethics With Vulnerable Groups Part Five: Relational Research Ethics Part Six: Researching Digitally This Handbook is a one-stop resource on qualitative research ethics across the social sciences that draws on the lessons learned and the successful methods for surmounting problems - the tried and true, and the new.
Reflexivity: Overcoming Mistrust between Research Ethics Committees and Researchers
Reflexivity: Overcoming Mistrust between Research Ethics Committees and Researchers
Introduction
Relationships between researchers and research ethics committees (RECs) have long been somewhat fraught. Recent empirical research shows that there is a persistent sense of mistrust between some researchers and REC members (Burris & Moss, 2006; Gillam et al., 2009; Guillemin et al., 2010; McCormack et al., 2012). Although researchers generally see the ethics review process as important in principle (Burris & Moss, 2006; Gillam et al., 2009), they also perceive the process as adversarial, and as creating unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles. Researchers from different disciplines and approaches, both quantitative and qualitative, feel not only frustrated, but also misunderstood and mistrusted by RECs (Gillam et ...
- Loading...