Summary
Contents
Kirk and Miller define what is -- and what is not -- qualitative research. They suggest that the use of numbers in the process of recording and analyzing observations is less important than that the research should involve sustained interaction with the people being studied, in their own language and on their own turf. Following a chapter on objectivity, the authors discuss the role of reliability and validity and the problems that arise when these issues are neglected. They present a paradigm for the qualitative research process that makes it possible to pursue validity without neglecting reliability.
Ethnographic Decision Making: The Four Phases of Qualitative Research
Ethnographic Decision Making: The Four Phases of Qualitative Research
Writing a communicable account of a complex event in a social situation requires not only a high degree of literacy but at least some comprehension of the social science purposes for which the record may have its uses. It is a task in which the beginner and professional social scientist, if they were to compare notes, ...
