Summary
Contents
Subject index
KEY FEATURES: A narrative writing style enhances accessibility and keeps readers engaged. Chapters begin and end with relatable examples to make the material more memorable and easier to learn. Chapter-opening learning objectives introduce students to the material and prompt them to identify the key takeaways in their reading. Conclusion sections in each chapter integrate information that students can review to check their comprehension. Chapter-ending discussion and research questions provide opportunities for students to further engage with the material to master chapter content.
Psychological Testing in the Legal Arena: Child Custody in High Conflict Divorce
Psychological Testing in the Legal Arena: Child Custody in High Conflict Divorce
Learning Objectives
- Explain why psychological tests used in forensic settings require strong psychometric foundations
- Describe how forensic psychologists can show that the tests they used in a specific case were valid for the purpose they were intended to serve
- Identify the chief differences between a clinical and forensic evaluation
- Define Daubert criteria and explain how Daubert criteria are relevant to psychological testing in legal contexts
- Discuss the importance of considering the context of the evaluation when interpreting test findings in child custody disputes
- Explain why psychologists use both computer and evaluator generated interpretations of test results in child custody evaluations
Psychological tests are employed in many different legal contexts. A plaintiff in a civil suit alleging psychological harm, such ...
- Loading...